Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28611 - 28620 of 55310 for n c c.
Search results 28611 - 28620 of 55310 for n c c.
State v. Scott A. Magnuson
of thirty-two years. See §§ 943.10(1)(a), 939.50(3)(c), and 939.62(1)(b), Stats. Before imposing the two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13541 - 2005-03-31
of thirty-two years. See §§ 943.10(1)(a), 939.50(3)(c), and 939.62(1)(b), Stats. Before imposing the two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13541 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Supreme Court Statistics February 2025
and KAROFSKY, JJ., joined. REBECCA GRASSL BRADLEY, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which ZIEGLER, C..J
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=926367 - 2025-03-11
and KAROFSKY, JJ., joined. REBECCA GRASSL BRADLEY, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which ZIEGLER, C..J
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=926367 - 2025-03-11
State v. Samuel D. Clay
. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J., Vergeront, J., and Paul C. Gartzke, Reserve Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9431 - 2005-03-31
. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J., Vergeront, J., and Paul C. Gartzke, Reserve Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9431 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(c) (2011-12). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92582 - 2013-02-12
judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(c) (2011-12). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92582 - 2013-02-12
Frontsheet
the conclusion in respect to the misconduct or medical incapacity. (c) The misconduct justifies substantially
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91963 - 2013-01-22
the conclusion in respect to the misconduct or medical incapacity. (c) The misconduct justifies substantially
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91963 - 2013-01-22
State v. Casey J. Shelton
. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(c) (1999-2000). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3930 - 2005-03-31
. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(c) (1999-2000). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3930 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. Stat. § 911.01(4)(c) (rules of evidence do not apply to revocation hearings). While a violation may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96147 - 2013-05-07
. Stat. § 911.01(4)(c) (rules of evidence do not apply to revocation hearings). While a violation may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96147 - 2013-05-07
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 943.20(2)(c). The State argues that this definition shows that a person can commit theft from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130272 - 2014-11-25
. Stat. § 943.20(2)(c). The State argues that this definition shows that a person can commit theft from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130272 - 2014-11-25
COURT OF APPEALS
that they can be readily and distinctly seen and read” at all times. Section 341.15(3)(c) provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40058 - 2009-08-26
that they can be readily and distinctly seen and read” at all times. Section 341.15(3)(c) provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40058 - 2009-08-26
State v. Michelle L. Denzer
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shannon C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15859 - 2005-03-31
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shannon C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15859 - 2005-03-31