Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28631 - 28640 of 29810 for des.

[PDF] Welton Ventures Limited Partnership v. Project Coordinators, Inc.
provision is ambiguous is a question we decide de novo. See Kernz v. J.L. French Corp., 2003 WI App 140
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25108 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Frontsheet
A referee's findings of fact are affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254747 - 2020-02-20

[PDF] State v. Mark Inglin
jurisdiction presents an issue of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Webster, 196 Wis.2d 308, 316
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13173 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 2
on different grounds. ¶33 We review de novo an order for summary judgment, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90102 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 70
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. K.N.K. v. Buhler, 139 Wis. 2d 190, 198, 407 N.W.2d 281 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=224146 - 2018-12-06

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 21, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
a grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. M & I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52387 - 2010-07-20

COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
the conviction is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Booker, 2006 WI 79, ¶12, 292 Wis. 2d 43
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52386 - 2011-08-21

COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
(Ct. App. 1985). Instead, we interpret these statutes de novo. Grafft, 238 Wis. 2d 750, ¶4. ¶18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50938 - 2010-07-27

[PDF] WI 63
whether Vice's statements were voluntary, our review is de novo. Id. III. ANALYSIS ¶22 We begin
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=378663 - 2021-08-02

[PDF] WI APP 15
of law, which we review de novo, benefiting from the analysis of the circuit court. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133996 - 2017-09-21