Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28631 - 28640 of 67825 for law.

Timothy J. Winters v. Linda Winters
] The application of an administrative rule to undisputed facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Weis v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17623 - 2005-05-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
provided constitutionally ineffective assistance presents mixed questions of law and fact. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177499 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jack R. Hayes
is a question of law we review de novo. Id. Because the trial court did not rule on the deficiency component
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4784 - 2005-03-31

State of Wisconsin-Department of Corrections v. David H. Schwarz
of Hearings and Appeals. Schwartz affirmed the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) decision not to revoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6714 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
purposes is a question of law, which must be decided by this court de novo. Forbes contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120484 - 2014-08-27

Georgia C. Lang v. Charles A. Lang
of law. We conclude that the record supports the trial court’s determination that the agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6805 - 2005-03-31

State v. Norman O. Brown
if the facts establish standing as a question of law. State v. Rhodes, 149 Wis.2d 722, 724-25, 439 N.W.2d 630
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12715 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
it proceeded on correct theory of law; (3) whether its action was arbitrary, oppressive, or unreasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50544 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
consent law, WIS. STAT. § 343.305. Haliw contends that he did not drive his friend’s truck on the night
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=472151 - 2022-01-13

[PDF] State v. Davina A. Pierce
that no reasonable judge, acting on the same facts and underlying law, could reach the same conclusion. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14937 - 2017-09-21