Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28631 - 28640 of 55781 for n y c.
Search results 28631 - 28640 of 55781 for n y c.
[PDF]
2021AP001450 - Response of Citizen Mathematicians and Scientists to Motion to Recuse Justice Protasiewicz
Legislature and its allies once again move to recuse Justice Janet C. Protasiewicz based on reported
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1450_020724response.pdf - 2024-02-07
Legislature and its allies once again move to recuse Justice Janet C. Protasiewicz based on reported
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1450_020724response.pdf - 2024-02-07
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
REVW Oral Arg 09/17/2015 3 Eau Claire -- 2013AP2686-CR State v. Luis C. Salinas Did
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168289 - 2017-09-21
REVW Oral Arg 09/17/2015 3 Eau Claire -- 2013AP2686-CR State v. Luis C. Salinas Did
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168289 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
SC Table of Pending Cases - Added the decision in case no. 2014AP940
REVW Oral Arg 09/17/2015 3 Eau Claire -- 2013AP2686-CR State v. Luis C. Salinas Did
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=167911 - 2017-09-21
REVW Oral Arg 09/17/2015 3 Eau Claire -- 2013AP2686-CR State v. Luis C. Salinas Did
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=167911 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Mildred Black v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
282, 291 n.5, 453 N.W.2d 158, 162 n.5 (Ct. App. 1990). Nos. 98-3090, 98-3124, 98-3125, 98-3126
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14720 - 2017-09-21
282, 291 n.5, 453 N.W.2d 158, 162 n.5 (Ct. App. 1990). Nos. 98-3090, 98-3124, 98-3125, 98-3126
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14720 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argument. Specifically, the court explained that defense counsel’s advice “was not inaccurate”; that “[n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980479 - 2025-07-08
argument. Specifically, the court explained that defense counsel’s advice “was not inaccurate”; that “[n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980479 - 2025-07-08
[PDF]
Frontsheet
. "[N]o reasonable jury could have fairly come to any other decision." Id. at 530. C. Court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=671385 - 2023-06-23
. "[N]o reasonable jury could have fairly come to any other decision." Id. at 530. C. Court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=671385 - 2023-06-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
,” but the defense would “leave it up to the [c]ourt.” The circuit court found probable cause and bound Hurley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111589 - 2017-09-21
,” but the defense would “leave it up to the [c]ourt.” The circuit court found probable cause and bound Hurley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111589 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
prejudice”); State v. Saunders, 2011 WI App 156, ¶29 & n.5, 338 Wis. 2d 160, 807 N.W.2d 679 (failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83172 - 2014-09-15
prejudice”); State v. Saunders, 2011 WI App 156, ¶29 & n.5, 338 Wis. 2d 160, 807 N.W.2d 679 (failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83172 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Linda Margaret Salveson v. Douglas County
States v. N. L. Indus., Inc., 479 F.2d 354, 379 (8th Cir. 1973) (citations omitted). “It follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15360 - 2017-09-21
States v. N. L. Indus., Inc., 479 F.2d 354, 379 (8th Cir. 1973) (citations omitted). “It follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15360 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
statements to police. 3 We disagree. ¶25 “The Sixth Amendment provides that ‘[i]n all criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141476 - 2017-09-21
statements to police. 3 We disagree. ¶25 “The Sixth Amendment provides that ‘[i]n all criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141476 - 2017-09-21