Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28631 - 28640 of 59294 for quit claim deed.
Search results 28631 - 28640 of 59294 for quit claim deed.
Elton K. Feffer v. Town of Delavan
the property’s value, he or she has the burden of proving that any circumstance which the taxpayer claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11322 - 2005-03-31
the property’s value, he or she has the burden of proving that any circumstance which the taxpayer claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11322 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and James cannot claim his trial counsel was ineffective for following James’s own directive. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117316 - 2014-07-16
and James cannot claim his trial counsel was ineffective for following James’s own directive. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117316 - 2014-07-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
” in which he claimed there was a new factor. Specifically, he identified the “unknowingly overlooked fact
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191310 - 2017-09-21
” in which he claimed there was a new factor. Specifically, he identified the “unknowingly overlooked fact
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191310 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
assessment that a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in connection with the plea would be wholly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=923479 - 2025-03-06
assessment that a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in connection with the plea would be wholly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=923479 - 2025-03-06
State v. Omar S. Polk
on the claim. See State v. Bentley, 201 Wis.2d 303, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996). In order to prove a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14766 - 2005-03-31
on the claim. See State v. Bentley, 201 Wis.2d 303, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996). In order to prove a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14766 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel J. Voigt
appeals his judgment of conviction for solicitation of first-degree intentional homicide. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14761 - 2005-03-31
appeals his judgment of conviction for solicitation of first-degree intentional homicide. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14761 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ardie Byrd
with one year of jail confinement as a condition. On this appeal, Byrd claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11212 - 2005-03-31
with one year of jail confinement as a condition. On this appeal, Byrd claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11212 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Juan Mata
now claims that the trial court committed prejudicial error when it read the repeater portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12854 - 2017-09-21
now claims that the trial court committed prejudicial error when it read the repeater portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12854 - 2017-09-21
State v. William R. Gates
that it was not knowing and voluntary concerning the potential maximum sentence. He claimed that the trial court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9333 - 2005-03-31
that it was not knowing and voluntary concerning the potential maximum sentence. He claimed that the trial court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9333 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
on their counterclaim for bad faith claim. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶6 This court reviews summary judgment decisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95621 - 2010-10-27
on their counterclaim for bad faith claim. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶6 This court reviews summary judgment decisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95621 - 2010-10-27