Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28631 - 28640 of 64150 for records.

State v. Charles W. Dawn
time to prepare for trial; (2) the opening statements and closing arguments were not recorded; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8855 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
by the record and the evidence.” Dodd appeals from the post-remand order. ¶5 The issue at the evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33902 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
that there was insufficient justification for police to conduct an investigative stop, the record demonstrates otherwise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27589 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Phillip Wayne Harvey
of the record, we conclude that Harvey failed to demonstrate how the alleged change in parole policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18774 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Town of East Troy v. Village of Mukwonago
determination, we examine the record to determine if the trial court logically interpreted the facts, applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4876 - 2017-09-19

State v. Stanley H. Graewin
by the trial court so long as the court considered the facts of record under the proper legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15734 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
not filed a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235213 - 2019-02-14

[PDF] Gary W. Seavert v. J. M. Remodeling & Home Repair
is not clearly erroneous. There is sufficient evidence in the record to support the trial court’s choice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21042 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious appellate issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240964 - 2019-05-17

[PDF] NOTICE
the record of the administrative board to which certiorari is directed. Hearst-Argyle Stations, Inc. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28212 - 2014-09-15