Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28641 - 28650 of 45831 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 28641 - 28650 of 45831 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a sufficient showing on one prong of the Strickland test, we need not address the other. Id. at 697
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=221655 - 2018-10-10
a sufficient showing on one prong of the Strickland test, we need not address the other. Id. at 697
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=221655 - 2018-10-10
[PDF]
State v. Bryan Hoover
are questions of law that we review independently. Id. ¶9 The test for ineffective assistance of counsel has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5401 - 2017-09-19
are questions of law that we review independently. Id. ¶9 The test for ineffective assistance of counsel has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5401 - 2017-09-19
Eric Andersen v. Village of Little Chute
. App. 1987), suggests the contrary: [U]nder a strict navigability in fact test, for which seasonal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9221 - 2005-03-31
. App. 1987), suggests the contrary: [U]nder a strict navigability in fact test, for which seasonal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9221 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the United States Supreme Court’s two- pronged Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236273 - 2019-03-05
the United States Supreme Court’s two- pronged Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236273 - 2019-03-05
[PDF]
Frontsheet
, to address the majority's imprudent, sua sponte decision to modify the legal test adopted by this court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241791 - 2019-06-06
, to address the majority's imprudent, sua sponte decision to modify the legal test adopted by this court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241791 - 2019-06-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
applies to the officers’ actions. We apply a three-step test: “(1) whether a search or seizure within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209550 - 2018-03-08
applies to the officers’ actions. We apply a three-step test: “(1) whether a search or seizure within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209550 - 2018-03-08
[PDF]
WI APP 120
in, but whether the trial court properly exercised its discretion.” Id. The test is not whether this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36917 - 2014-09-15
in, but whether the trial court properly exercised its discretion.” Id. The test is not whether this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36917 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the sufficiency test this way: “[T]he relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89570 - 2012-11-26
the sufficiency test this way: “[T]he relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89570 - 2012-11-26
[PDF]
Frontsheet
." This test suggests that something can be identified by its habitual characteristics, i.e. how
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241515 - 2019-07-30
." This test suggests that something can be identified by its habitual characteristics, i.e. how
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241515 - 2019-07-30
State v. Chris J. Jacobs III
trial violated the fundamental fairness test of the due process clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15168 - 2005-03-31
trial violated the fundamental fairness test of the due process clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15168 - 2005-03-31