Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28651 - 28660 of 30059 for de.
Search results 28651 - 28660 of 30059 for de.
[PDF]
WI App 51
. “The interpretation and application of a statute present questions of law that this court reviews de novo while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987268 - 2025-09-23
. “The interpretation and application of a statute present questions of law that this court reviews de novo while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987268 - 2025-09-23
[PDF]
WI APP 21
de novo, while benefiting from the agency’s analysis. Black v. City of Milwaukee, 2016 WI 47
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=511924 - 2022-06-08
de novo, while benefiting from the agency’s analysis. Black v. City of Milwaukee, 2016 WI 47
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=511924 - 2022-06-08
[PDF]
State v. James M. Moran
are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Harris, 2004 WI 64, ¶25, 272 Wis. 2d 80, 680 N.W
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18971 - 2017-09-21
are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Harris, 2004 WI 64, ¶25, 272 Wis. 2d 80, 680 N.W
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18971 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo whether a due process violation occurred. State v. Wayerski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250711 - 2019-11-27
are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo whether a due process violation occurred. State v. Wayerski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250711 - 2019-11-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
satisfies its “burden of proof under WIS. STAT. § 706.04 is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=563503 - 2022-09-09
satisfies its “burden of proof under WIS. STAT. § 706.04 is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=563503 - 2022-09-09
[PDF]
WI APP 229
court refused. This appeal followed. Standard of Review ¶21 We review statutory construction de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26797 - 2014-09-15
court refused. This appeal followed. Standard of Review ¶21 We review statutory construction de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26797 - 2014-09-15
State v. Paul J. Stuart
a decision establishes the law of the case raises a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16510 - 2005-03-31
a decision establishes the law of the case raises a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16510 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 24
review de novo. Olson v. Town of Cottage Grove, 2008 WI 51, ¶32, 309 Wis. 2d 365, 749 N.W.2d 211
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239611 - 2019-06-11
review de novo. Olson v. Town of Cottage Grove, 2008 WI 51, ¶32, 309 Wis. 2d 365, 749 N.W.2d 211
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239611 - 2019-06-11
[PDF]
. Whether a complaint states a claim is a question of law that we review de novo. Data Key Partners v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910756 - 2025-02-06
. Whether a complaint states a claim is a question of law that we review de novo. Data Key Partners v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910756 - 2025-02-06
D.S. Farms v. Northern States Power Company
of law that we review de novo. Johnson v. Misericordia Comm. Hosp., 99 Wis.2d 708, 723, 301 N.W.2d 156
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7983 - 2005-03-31
of law that we review de novo. Johnson v. Misericordia Comm. Hosp., 99 Wis.2d 708, 723, 301 N.W.2d 156
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7983 - 2005-03-31