Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28651 - 28660 of 29810 for des.
Search results 28651 - 28660 of 29810 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
. The constitutionality of a statute, as it applies to particular facts, is a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111955 - 2014-05-07
. The constitutionality of a statute, as it applies to particular facts, is a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111955 - 2014-05-07
State v. McKinley Williams
. Supp. 132 (D.R.I. 1996); but see United States v. De Leon-Reyna, 930 F.2d 396 (5th Cir. 1991) (good
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11399 - 2005-03-31
. Supp. 132 (D.R.I. 1996); but see United States v. De Leon-Reyna, 930 F.2d 396 (5th Cir. 1991) (good
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11399 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reviews de novo. Therese S., 314 Wis. 2d 493, ¶7. We look to the entire record and the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173493 - 2017-09-21
reviews de novo. Therese S., 314 Wis. 2d 493, ¶7. We look to the entire record and the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173493 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of qualified attorney immunity presents a legal issue that we review de novo. For the following reasons, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135983 - 2017-09-21
of qualified attorney immunity presents a legal issue that we review de novo. For the following reasons, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135983 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
James B. Linden v. Cascade Stone Company, Inc.
court properly granted a motion for summary judgment is a question of law we review de novo, valuing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18947 - 2017-09-21
court properly granted a motion for summary judgment is a question of law we review de novo, valuing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18947 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 51
. “The interpretation and application of a statute present questions of law that this court reviews de novo while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987268 - 2025-09-23
. “The interpretation and application of a statute present questions of law that this court reviews de novo while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987268 - 2025-09-23
[PDF]
WI APP 21
de novo, while benefiting from the agency’s analysis. Black v. City of Milwaukee, 2016 WI 47
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=511924 - 2022-06-08
de novo, while benefiting from the agency’s analysis. Black v. City of Milwaukee, 2016 WI 47
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=511924 - 2022-06-08
[PDF]
State v. James M. Moran
are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Harris, 2004 WI 64, ¶25, 272 Wis. 2d 80, 680 N.W
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18971 - 2017-09-21
are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Harris, 2004 WI 64, ¶25, 272 Wis. 2d 80, 680 N.W
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18971 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo whether a due process violation occurred. State v. Wayerski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250711 - 2019-11-27
are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo whether a due process violation occurred. State v. Wayerski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250711 - 2019-11-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
satisfies its “burden of proof under WIS. STAT. § 706.04 is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=563503 - 2022-09-09
satisfies its “burden of proof under WIS. STAT. § 706.04 is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=563503 - 2022-09-09