Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28651 - 28660 of 46054 for paternity test paper work.

COURT OF APPEALS
was ineffective, we apply a two-part test: To prevail on an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86161 - 2012-08-15

[PDF] WI App 16
the allegations can be tested). No. 2019AP1977-CR 4 ¶5 After the hearing was scheduled, Atwater
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=331672 - 2021-04-19

State v. Emmett White
The familiar two-pronged test for ineffective assistance of counsel claims is found in Strickland v. Washington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10472 - 2005-03-31

Wangard Partners, Inc. v. Gerald Graf
, ¶15, 248 Wis. 2d 380, 635 N.W.2d 896 (motion to dismiss tests sufficiency of the complaint, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25241 - 2006-06-27

[PDF] State v. Kelly Scott Roberts
affidavit, Huth confirms that he was contacted by an investigator working with the defense, who questioned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8228 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 27, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
with instructions not to return to work until he had seen a doctor. Two days after the accident, Golden was seen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28215 - 2007-02-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
(citation omitted). No. 2019AP1022-CR 6 ¶10 Our custody analysis is an “objective test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=891296 - 2024-12-17

[PDF] Gerald F. Gonwa v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
who works with medical assistance statutes begins by appreciating that the federal and state statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5826 - 2017-09-19

Kimberly Schreiber v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin
followed an objective test. See, e.g., Scaria, 68 Wis.2d at 12, 227 N.W.2d at 654-55. We do not believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11886 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and is entitled to a CUP.” This argument misapprehends our standard of review. The substantial evidence test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=167923 - 2017-09-21