Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28661 - 28670 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.

COURT OF APPEALS
Donnell Sholar appeals a judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143716 - 2008-06-26

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 24, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of A...
for the following three years. After a jury trial in September 2009, they settled the case. Hupy’s Motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135519 - 2015-02-23

[PDF] WI App 150
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Adamczak argues on appeal that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103832 - 2017-09-21

State v. LaMorris P. Britton
of armed robbery. He also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He raises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11272 - 2010-06-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
(collectively EFWR), appeal an order No. 2020AP1694 2 denying a motion to stay the proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526420 - 2022-06-01

[PDF] State v. Christopher L. Berry
motion for postconviction relief under WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (1999- No. 01-3359 2 2000). 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4697 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. James A. Tanksley
an order1 denying his motion for severance and separate trials for sexual assault charges involving two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16289 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - February 2023
. On September 2, 2021, M.R.M. filed a motion for reconsideration based on a statement by the circuit court
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=624171 - 2023-02-15

[PDF] Wisconsin Supreme Court oral argument - February 2023
. On September 2, 2021, M.R.M. filed a motion for reconsideration based on a statement by the circuit court
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oralargcasesynopsfeb2023.pdf - 2023-02-15

State v. Michael D. Sykes
motions to suppress. In his first motion, Sykes argued that the court lacked personal jurisdiction over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6460 - 2005-03-31