Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28661 - 28670 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.

[PDF] State v. LaMorris P. Britton
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He raises numerous issues; we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11272 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Dujuan T. Nash
) (1999-2000).1 Nash also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4392 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] William Schwartz v. Jeffrey Schwartz
of process claim. When a trial court grants a motion for a new trial in the interest of justice, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10094 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
(collectively EFWR), appeal an order No. 2020AP1694 2 denying a motion to stay the proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526420 - 2022-06-01

[PDF] State v. Christopher L. Berry
motion for postconviction relief under WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (1999- No. 01-3359 2 2000). 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4697 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. James A. Tanksley
an order1 denying his motion for severance and separate trials for sexual assault charges involving two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16289 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - February 2023
. On September 2, 2021, M.R.M. filed a motion for reconsideration based on a statement by the circuit court
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=624171 - 2023-02-15

[PDF] Wisconsin Supreme Court oral argument - February 2023
. On September 2, 2021, M.R.M. filed a motion for reconsideration based on a statement by the circuit court
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oralargcasesynopsfeb2023.pdf - 2023-02-15

State v. Michael D. Sykes
motions to suppress. In his first motion, Sykes argued that the court lacked personal jurisdiction over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6460 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Carl H. Creedy v. Axley Brynelson
on the firm’s motion to compel discovery—to which Creedy responded with a motion to limit the scope
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12295 - 2017-09-21