Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28661 - 28670 of 63725 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 28661 - 28670 of 63725 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals a judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143716 - 2017-09-21
appeals a judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143716 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 12, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of App...
solely on the incest ground. Jayvonne opposed the motion, contending that she was the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35873 - 2009-03-11
solely on the incest ground. Jayvonne opposed the motion, contending that she was the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35873 - 2009-03-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(collectively EFWR), appeal an order No. 2020AP1694 2 denying a motion to stay the proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526420 - 2022-06-01
(collectively EFWR), appeal an order No. 2020AP1694 2 denying a motion to stay the proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526420 - 2022-06-01
[PDF]
State v. Christopher L. Berry
motion for postconviction relief under WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (1999- No. 01-3359 2 2000). 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4697 - 2017-09-19
motion for postconviction relief under WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (1999- No. 01-3359 2 2000). 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4697 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. James A. Tanksley
an order1 denying his motion for severance and separate trials for sexual assault charges involving two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16289 - 2017-09-21
an order1 denying his motion for severance and separate trials for sexual assault charges involving two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16289 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - February 2023
. On September 2, 2021, M.R.M. filed a motion for reconsideration based on a statement by the circuit court
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=624171 - 2023-02-15
. On September 2, 2021, M.R.M. filed a motion for reconsideration based on a statement by the circuit court
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=624171 - 2023-02-15
[PDF]
Wisconsin Supreme Court oral argument - February 2023
. On September 2, 2021, M.R.M. filed a motion for reconsideration based on a statement by the circuit court
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oralargcasesynopsfeb2023.pdf - 2023-02-15
. On September 2, 2021, M.R.M. filed a motion for reconsideration based on a statement by the circuit court
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oralargcasesynopsfeb2023.pdf - 2023-02-15
State v. Michael D. Sykes
motions to suppress. In his first motion, Sykes argued that the court lacked personal jurisdiction over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6460 - 2005-03-31
motions to suppress. In his first motion, Sykes argued that the court lacked personal jurisdiction over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6460 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Carl H. Creedy v. Axley Brynelson
on the firm’s motion to compel discovery—to which Creedy responded with a motion to limit the scope
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12295 - 2017-09-21
on the firm’s motion to compel discovery—to which Creedy responded with a motion to limit the scope
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12295 - 2017-09-21
Timothy C. Gahagan v. Scott W. Jakubowski
the Stahles to file a late answer to the amended complaint and to file a late response to the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11031 - 2005-03-31
the Stahles to file a late answer to the amended complaint and to file a late response to the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11031 - 2005-03-31