Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28661 - 28670 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
Search results 28661 - 28670 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
not govern the decision in this case. Therefore, Boe’s first argument is that the previous court of appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106668 - 2014-01-13
not govern the decision in this case. Therefore, Boe’s first argument is that the previous court of appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106668 - 2014-01-13
COURT OF APPEALS
. The circuit court ordered Ware to serve his sentence in case No. 2011CF6171 consecutively to the reconfinement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102927 - 2013-10-14
. The circuit court ordered Ware to serve his sentence in case No. 2011CF6171 consecutively to the reconfinement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102927 - 2013-10-14
COURT OF APPEALS
WI 55, we held this case in abeyance pending the supreme court opinion.[2] ¶3 On June 29, 2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53438 - 2010-08-17
WI 55, we held this case in abeyance pending the supreme court opinion.[2] ¶3 On June 29, 2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53438 - 2010-08-17
COURT OF APPEALS
was charged in Milwaukee County Circuit Court Case No. 2006CM5863 with a single count of knowingly violating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85767 - 2012-08-06
was charged in Milwaukee County Circuit Court Case No. 2006CM5863 with a single count of knowingly violating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85767 - 2012-08-06
COURT OF APPEALS
court specifically said that while it understood the State’s argument about the case, that case had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35708 - 2009-03-03
court specifically said that while it understood the State’s argument about the case, that case had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35708 - 2009-03-03
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case was pending, he returned to circuit court on March 26, 2008, for a reconfinement hearing in case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110526 - 2014-04-21
in this case was pending, he returned to circuit court on March 26, 2008, for a reconfinement hearing in case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110526 - 2014-04-21
COURT OF APPEALS
” cases discussed in Faucher. ¶10 In Faucher, the supreme court clarified Wisconsin’s jury bias
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74579 - 2011-11-30
” cases discussed in Faucher. ¶10 In Faucher, the supreme court clarified Wisconsin’s jury bias
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74579 - 2011-11-30
[PDF]
STATE OF WISCONSIN, CIRCUIT COURT,
of service of the last transcript or service of a copy of the circuit court case record
/formdisplay/CA-120.pdf?formNumber=CA-120&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2021-06-30
of service of the last transcript or service of a copy of the circuit court case record
/formdisplay/CA-120.pdf?formNumber=CA-120&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2021-06-30
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court in other cases and statements from counsel. ¶4 We conclude that there was evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42978 - 2009-11-03
of the circuit court in other cases and statements from counsel. ¶4 We conclude that there was evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42978 - 2009-11-03
COURT OF APPEALS
, that the circuit court erred in admitting evidence regarding those cases, and that the prosecutor engaged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124592 - 2014-10-15
, that the circuit court erred in admitting evidence regarding those cases, and that the prosecutor engaged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124592 - 2014-10-15