Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28661 - 28670 of 58492 for speedy trial.

[PDF]
, alleging that he was delinquent on his mortgage. At the date set for trial, September 13, 2011
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97315 - 2014-09-15

State v. Robert T. Langston
agree with counsel’s analysis that the trial court followed all of the requirements for accepting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11319 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
motion to vacate his convictions on five criminal charges. We affirm the trial court’s decision on both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33502 - 2008-07-23

[PDF] Jeffrey Ernstmeyer v. Rodney Sussek
his personal injury lawsuit. He claims the trial court erred in determining, as a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15097 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
sought an adjournment of the scheduled trial due to the unavailability of a crucial witness, Wright
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=608361 - 2023-01-10

[PDF] NOTICE
or the trials of two co-defendants. White went on to name eighteen “witnesses of interest” for whom he sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36760 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Marjorie Haugen v. Michael Reis
rent. ¶3 The trial court concluded that the lease was ambiguous and construed the ambiguity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16093 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Aaron J. Lindh
that the court did not err, and we affirm. No. 00-0991-CR 2 ¶2 Lindh’s trial focused on whether he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2487 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
therefore summarily affirm the judgment. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1). At the outset of the court trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699387 - 2023-09-06

[PDF] CA Blank Order
counsel’s analysis in the supplemental no-merit report. Trial counsel did not object to the hearsay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841247 - 2024-08-22