Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28671 - 28680 of 30059 for de.
Search results 28671 - 28680 of 30059 for de.
[PDF]
WI APP 21
the interpretation of a statute, is generally a question of law, subject to de novo review. Brown v. Brown, 177
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27904 - 2014-09-15
the interpretation of a statute, is generally a question of law, subject to de novo review. Brown v. Brown, 177
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27904 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
unless they are clearly erroneous, but we determine the child’s best interest de novo. See Douglas L
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=482816 - 2022-02-15
unless they are clearly erroneous, but we determine the child’s best interest de novo. See Douglas L
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=482816 - 2022-02-15
[PDF]
WI APP 249
a question of law, which we review de novo. See Hokin v. Hokin, 231 Wis. 2d 184, 191, 605 N.W.2d 219 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27294 - 2014-09-15
a question of law, which we review de novo. See Hokin v. Hokin, 231 Wis. 2d 184, 191, 605 N.W.2d 219 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27294 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Shannon Buettner
, present issues subject to our de novo review. Cf. id. at 626-27, 486 N.W.2d 544-45. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11825 - 2017-09-21
, present issues subject to our de novo review. Cf. id. at 626-27, 486 N.W.2d 544-45. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11825 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
unless they are clearly erroneous. We then independently apply the law to those facts de novo.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56777 - 2010-11-15
unless they are clearly erroneous. We then independently apply the law to those facts de novo.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56777 - 2010-11-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the interpretation and application of § 971.14 de novo. See Kieninger v. Crown Equip. Corp., 2019 WI 27, ¶12, 386
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=585965 - 2022-11-10
the interpretation and application of § 971.14 de novo. See Kieninger v. Crown Equip. Corp., 2019 WI 27, ¶12, 386
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=585965 - 2022-11-10
[PDF]
State v. Mark Inglin
jurisdiction presents an issue of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Webster, 196 Wis.2d 308, 316
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13173 - 2017-09-21
jurisdiction presents an issue of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Webster, 196 Wis.2d 308, 316
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13173 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 116
.” Id. ¶8 How do these concepts work here? While we review summary judgments de novo, Lambrecht
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52715 - 2014-09-15
.” Id. ¶8 How do these concepts work here? While we review summary judgments de novo, Lambrecht
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52715 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI 58
review de novo. Id. (citing State v. Weed, 2003 WI 85, ¶10, 263 Wis. 2d 434, 666 N.W.2d 485). III
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29150 - 2014-09-15
review de novo. Id. (citing State v. Weed, 2003 WI 85, ¶10, 263 Wis. 2d 434, 666 N.W.2d 485). III
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29150 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the lawyer’s performance was deficient and, if so, prejudicial, are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=810187 - 2024-06-06
the lawyer’s performance was deficient and, if so, prejudicial, are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=810187 - 2024-06-06