Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28681 - 28690 of 83293 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 28681 - 28690 of 83293 for simple case search/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
a case consolidation document at that hearing, which set forth the same agreement.[2] The plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97931 - 2013-06-10
a case consolidation document at that hearing, which set forth the same agreement.[2] The plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97931 - 2013-06-10
Thomas Moullette v. City of Rice Lake
that as in the [Fritsch v. St. Croix Cent. Sch. Dist., 183 Wis. 2d 336, 515 N.W.2d 328 (Ct. App. 1994)] case, if we ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4915 - 2005-03-31
that as in the [Fritsch v. St. Croix Cent. Sch. Dist., 183 Wis. 2d 336, 515 N.W.2d 328 (Ct. App. 1994)] case, if we ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4915 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to offer Davis a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) within ten days or the court would dismiss the case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=377016 - 2021-06-16
to offer Davis a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) within ten days or the court would dismiss the case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=377016 - 2021-06-16
[PDF]
N.E.M. v. Eugene Strigel
Case No.: 95-0755 Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16995 - 2017-09-21
Case No.: 95-0755 Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16995 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Paula Oltrogge
in misdemeanor cases “consist of 6 persons.” Three weeks after Oltrogge’s trial, the supreme court decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15423 - 2017-09-21
in misdemeanor cases “consist of 6 persons.” Three weeks after Oltrogge’s trial, the supreme court decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15423 - 2017-09-21
Bruce L. Ottinger v. Jose Pinel
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-3403
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11758 - 2011-08-23
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-3403
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11758 - 2011-08-23
COURT OF APPEALS
before he may be entitled to a fee waiver in conjunction with the case underlying this appeal for any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53891 - 2010-08-30
before he may be entitled to a fee waiver in conjunction with the case underlying this appeal for any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53891 - 2010-08-30
State v. Kevin Brown
2006 WI App 41 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP361 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21376 - 2006-03-22
2006 WI App 41 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP361 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21376 - 2006-03-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
into evidence in this case. She also attacks the credibility of the arresting officer, calling him evasive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34029 - 2014-09-15
into evidence in this case. She also attacks the credibility of the arresting officer, calling him evasive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34029 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Response to Letter Briefs (Lisa Hunter et al.)
conclude. Case 2021AP001450 Lisa Hunter (et al.) Response to Letter Briefs Filed 10-13-2021 Page 1 of 6
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/resltrbriefshunter.pdf - 2021-10-18
conclude. Case 2021AP001450 Lisa Hunter (et al.) Response to Letter Briefs Filed 10-13-2021 Page 1 of 6
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/resltrbriefshunter.pdf - 2021-10-18