Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28691 - 28700 of 29810 for des.

[PDF] Frontsheet
conclusions of law on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Inglimo, 2007 WI 126, ¶5
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144075 - 2017-09-21

Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
to a tribally-owned business entity? Based on a de novo review with proper application of that test, or other
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=389&year=2012

L.L.N. v. J. Gibbs Clauder
the issues de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9447 - 2005-03-31

William E. Marberry v. Phillip G. Macht
). Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Curiel, 227 Wis. 2d 389, 404
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15998 - 2005-03-31

Frontsheet
court’s decision, and that of the court of appeals, de novo, but we benefit from those decisions. Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32246 - 2008-06-09

State v. Paul J. Stuart
a decision establishes the law of the case raises a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16510 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] General Star Indemnity Company v. The Bankruptcy Estate of Lake Geneva Sugar Shack, Inc.
review questions of law de novo. See Gardner, 190 Wis.2d at 243, 527 N.W.2d at 710. GenStar
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11170 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Metropolitan Ventures, LLC v. GEA Associates
reversed by the court of appeals. We review summary judgment decisions de novo, benefiting from
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25536 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Frontsheet
that this court reviews de novo while benefitting from the analyses of the court of appeals and circuit court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189579 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the interpretation and application of § 971.14 de novo. See Kieninger v. Crown Equip. Corp., 2019 WI 27, ¶12, 386
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=585965 - 2022-11-10