Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28691 - 28700 of 29713 for des.
Search results 28691 - 28700 of 29713 for des.
Frontsheet
erroneous. Second, we review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo." Id. See
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91350 - 2013-01-07
erroneous. Second, we review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo." Id. See
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91350 - 2013-01-07
[PDF]
WI App 35
review de novo. State v. Stewart, 2018 WI App 41, ¶18, 383 Wis. 2d 546, 916 N.W.2d 188. “‘[T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=354164 - 2021-06-14
review de novo. State v. Stewart, 2018 WI App 41, ¶18, 383 Wis. 2d 546, 916 N.W.2d 188. “‘[T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=354164 - 2021-06-14
[PDF]
WI 81
reviewed all of Gittel's arguments de novo and decided them against Gittel.3 3
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33324 - 2014-09-15
reviewed all of Gittel's arguments de novo and decided them against Gittel.3 3
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33324 - 2014-09-15
State v. Michael L. Veach
2001 WI App 143 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: ...
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14400 - 2005-03-31
2001 WI App 143 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: ...
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14400 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Dodge County: MARTIN J. DE VRIES, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=582814 - 2022-10-27
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Dodge County: MARTIN J. DE VRIES, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=582814 - 2022-10-27
[PDF]
WI 95
and that the error or errors prejudiced the defendant, presents a question of law that this court decides de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73102 - 2014-09-15
and that the error or errors prejudiced the defendant, presents a question of law that this court decides de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73102 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Melvin D. Pulver v. David G. Jennings
source rule prevents this reduction, as Jennings asserts, is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3086 - 2017-09-20
source rule prevents this reduction, as Jennings asserts, is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3086 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mark A. Phillips
review the referee's conclusions of law, however, on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25140 - 2017-09-21
review the referee's conclusions of law, however, on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25140 - 2017-09-21
State v. Brian A. Jacobus
the instruction—is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Lohmeier, 196 Wis.2d 432, 441, 538 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9485 - 2005-03-31
the instruction—is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Lohmeier, 196 Wis.2d 432, 441, 538 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9485 - 2005-03-31
Joseph J. Paul v. Frederick C. Skemp, Jr.
. Such statutory construction is a question of law, which we review de novo, even though we benefit from
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17534 - 2005-03-31
. Such statutory construction is a question of law, which we review de novo, even though we benefit from
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17534 - 2005-03-31