Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2871 - 2880 of 17366 for Cost.
Search results 2871 - 2880 of 17366 for Cost.
[PDF]
WI App 79
by the patient, a single retrieval fee of $20 for all copies requested. 6. Actual shipping costs and any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=303462 - 2021-01-08
by the patient, a single retrieval fee of $20 for all copies requested. 6. Actual shipping costs and any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=303462 - 2021-01-08
[PDF]
WI 12
the costs No. 2012AP668-D 2 of the proceeding, which total $436.56 as of October 15, 2012
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92089 - 2014-09-15
the costs No. 2012AP668-D 2 of the proceeding, which total $436.56 as of October 15, 2012
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92089 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and remand for the circuit court to assess the cost of transcript preparation against Slocum. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162724 - 2017-09-21
, and remand for the circuit court to assess the cost of transcript preparation against Slocum. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162724 - 2017-09-21
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John A. Birdsall
be required to pay the costs of the disciplinary proceeding now totaling $20,789.94. ¶3 We determine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16711 - 2005-03-31
be required to pay the costs of the disciplinary proceeding now totaling $20,789.94. ¶3 We determine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16711 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michele A. Tjader
, and to pay the costs of this proceeding. ¶2 We determine that a public reprimand is appropriate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16433 - 2005-03-31
, and to pay the costs of this proceeding. ¶2 We determine that a public reprimand is appropriate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16433 - 2005-03-31
Marino Construction Co., Inc. v. Renner Architects
of $195,104.63 in completion costs. As of the date that Marino was terminated, the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9849 - 2005-03-31
of $195,104.63 in completion costs. As of the date that Marino was terminated, the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9849 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Marino Construction Co., Inc. v. Renner Architects
or substandard work. The City incurred a total of $195,104.63 in completion costs. As of the date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9752 - 2017-09-19
or substandard work. The City incurred a total of $195,104.63 in completion costs. As of the date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9752 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI 62
of the costs to secure that income. Typical funds that would be placed in an IOLTA account include earnest
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37045 - 2014-09-15
of the costs to secure that income. Typical funds that would be placed in an IOLTA account include earnest
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37045 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
$8,178.80 in attorney’s fees and costs incurred to obtain reinstatement and $28,915.61 in attorney’s fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30884 - 2007-11-14
$8,178.80 in attorney’s fees and costs incurred to obtain reinstatement and $28,915.61 in attorney’s fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30884 - 2007-11-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as to any of the Eppstein Uhen respondents is limited to the costs taxed [to GRAEF-USA] in the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192141 - 2017-09-21
as to any of the Eppstein Uhen respondents is limited to the costs taxed [to GRAEF-USA] in the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192141 - 2017-09-21