Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2871 - 2880 of 17408 for Cost.

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John A. Birdsall
be required to pay the costs of the disciplinary proceeding now totaling $20,789.94. ¶3 We determine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16711 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
any type of obstruction in the vicinity of a neighboring, private airport and awarding costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47195 - 2014-09-15

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michele A. Tjader
, and to pay the costs of this proceeding. ¶2 We determine that a public reprimand is appropriate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16433 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, in relevant part: Items of costs. Except as provided in ss. 93.20, 100.195 (5m) (b), 100.30 (5m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175684 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 79
by the patient, a single retrieval fee of $20 for all copies requested. 6. Actual shipping costs and any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=303462 - 2021-01-08

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Seth P. Hartigan
that Attorney Hartigan should be publicly reprimanded and ordered to pay the costs of this proceeding. ¶2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20614 - 2005-12-12

[PDF] WI 28
the costs of the reinstatement proceeding, which are $5886.27, as of January 11, 2007. ¶3 Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28400 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Maureen B. Fitzgerald
misconduct and that she be required to pay the costs of this proceeding, which are $6844.07 as of March 14
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25393 - 2017-09-21

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Maureen B. Fitzgerald
for 90 days for professional misconduct and that she be required to pay the costs of this proceeding
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25393 - 2006-06-01

Frontsheet
be suspended for a period of six months and that she be required to pay the costs of this disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52671 - 2010-07-27