Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2871 - 2880 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
Search results 2871 - 2880 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
, upholding them unless clearly erroneous. Id. We review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107820 - 2014-02-11
, upholding them unless clearly erroneous. Id. We review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107820 - 2014-02-11
[PDF]
State v. Colleen M. Thomas
Where the facts are undisputed, “custody” is a question of law and this court reviews the issue de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15727 - 2017-09-21
Where the facts are undisputed, “custody” is a question of law and this court reviews the issue de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15727 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶16 We review the circuit court’s denial of a motion for JNOV de novo. Hicks v. Nunnery, 2002 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248820 - 2019-10-23
. ¶16 We review the circuit court’s denial of a motion for JNOV de novo. Hicks v. Nunnery, 2002 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248820 - 2019-10-23
[PDF]
State v. Ernest J.P., Jr.
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BROWN, J. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7128 - 2017-09-20
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BROWN, J. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7128 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
is a question of law that we review de novo. Paige K.B. ex rel. Peterson v. Steven G.B., 226 Wis. 2d 210, 223
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63179 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law that we review de novo. Paige K.B. ex rel. Peterson v. Steven G.B., 226 Wis. 2d 210, 223
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63179 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo.” Milwaukee Deputy Sheriffs’ Ass’n v. Milwaukee Cnty., 2016 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622415 - 2023-02-16
is a question of law that we review de novo.” Milwaukee Deputy Sheriffs’ Ass’n v. Milwaukee Cnty., 2016 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622415 - 2023-02-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to a claim is a legal question, which we review de novo. Zastrow v. Journal Commc’ns, Inc., 2006 WI 72
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236115 - 2019-02-27
to a claim is a legal question, which we review de novo. Zastrow v. Journal Commc’ns, Inc., 2006 WI 72
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236115 - 2019-02-27
[PDF]
Barbara Barritt v. Mary Carolyn Lowe
of summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same standard as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6020 - 2017-09-19
of summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same standard as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6020 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
City of Madison v. Vincent N. Spruill, Jr.
to apply constitutional principles to the facts, a matter of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6810 - 2017-09-20
to apply constitutional principles to the facts, a matter of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6810 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Shulbert Z. Williams
are questions of law, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2812 - 2017-09-19
are questions of law, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2812 - 2017-09-19