Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2871 - 2880 of 29810 for des.
Search results 2871 - 2880 of 29810 for des.
Zois Dertis v. Dimitrios Panagiotaras
decide de novo whether Dertis’s claim should have been brought as a shareholder’s derivative action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4295 - 2005-03-31
decide de novo whether Dertis’s claim should have been brought as a shareholder’s derivative action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4295 - 2005-03-31
State v. Colleen M. Thomas
the issue de novo. See State v. Swanson, 164 Wis.2d 437, 445, 475 N.W.2d 148, 152 (1991). Nonetheless, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15727 - 2005-03-31
the issue de novo. See State v. Swanson, 164 Wis.2d 437, 445, 475 N.W.2d 148, 152 (1991). Nonetheless, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15727 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
complaint, to file a de novo disciplinary action, or to take no action at all. In this case, a de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143347 - 2015-06-18
complaint, to file a de novo disciplinary action, or to take no action at all. In this case, a de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143347 - 2015-06-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and dismissed Chula Vista’s claims. Chula Vista now appeals. ¶5 We review summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546539 - 2022-07-21
and dismissed Chula Vista’s claims. Chula Vista now appeals. ¶5 We review summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546539 - 2022-07-21
[PDF]
Manor Park Village v. Robin Spoden
of the case. The application of a statute to a set of facts is an issue we decide de novo, without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9750 - 2017-09-19
of the case. The application of a statute to a set of facts is an issue we decide de novo, without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9750 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
to constitutional principles, which we review de novo.” Id. ¶7 The State contends that the officer had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66421 - 2011-06-22
to constitutional principles, which we review de novo.” Id. ¶7 The State contends that the officer had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66421 - 2011-06-22
Judith Moreno v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
’ action. DISCUSSION ¶5 We review decisions on summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15996 - 2005-03-31
’ action. DISCUSSION ¶5 We review decisions on summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15996 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
material facts to require a hearing is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶9
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1075035 - 2026-02-10
material facts to require a hearing is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶9
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1075035 - 2026-02-10
[PDF]
State v. Edward C. Brandau
we review de novo. Bangert, 131 Wis.2d at 283, 389 N.W.2d at 30. A rational basis supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14796 - 2017-09-21
we review de novo. Bangert, 131 Wis.2d at 283, 389 N.W.2d at 30. A rational basis supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14796 - 2017-09-21
Deutsches Land, Inc. v. City of Glendale
with an examination of the language of the statute itself to determine whether the language is clear or ambiguous. De
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11345 - 2005-03-31
with an examination of the language of the statute itself to determine whether the language is clear or ambiguous. De
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11345 - 2005-03-31