Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2871 - 2880 of 6659 for mix.

State v. Kevin C. Spinks
ineffective assistance is a mixed question of law and fact. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 633-34, 369 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18386 - 2005-06-06

COURT OF APPEALS
—submitted reports and testified. Fields testified that, although the research is “mixed,” the “speculation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52368 - 2010-07-20

State v. Francis E. Altman
This court’s review of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is a mixed question of fact and law. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26043 - 2006-07-31

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey P. Williamson
of an ineffective assistance claim as a mixed question of fact and law. See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 698. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2732 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Richard Allen Hassel
of constitutional fact, which presents a mixed question of fact and law. State v. Ross, 203 Wis. 2d 66, 79, 552
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7587 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is a mixed question of law and fact to which we apply a two-step standard of review. Id. We will uphold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245120 - 2019-08-13

State v. Rodney Henderson Reed
, mixing general erroneous-exercise-of-discretion theories with claims relating to the trial court's use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8174 - 2005-03-31

State v. Richard W. Hendrickson
of counsel claims present questions of mixed law and fact. State v. Moffett, 147 Wis. 2d 343, 352, 433 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3036 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, that is, a mixed question of law and fact to which we apply a two-step standard of review. Anagnos, 341 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106507 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
. “[B]oth the performance and prejudice components … are mixed questions of law and fact.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30554 - 2007-10-09