Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2871 - 2880 of 12912 for prosecuting.
Search results 2871 - 2880 of 12912 for prosecuting.
[PDF]
State v. Andrew L. Phillips
withdrawn, or a plea of no contest, or of an offer to the court or prosecuting attorney to plead guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7388 - 2017-09-20
withdrawn, or a plea of no contest, or of an offer to the court or prosecuting attorney to plead guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7388 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Charles Jones
2 Article I, § 7 of the Wisconsin Constitution states: In all criminal prosecutions the accused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16139 - 2017-09-21
2 Article I, § 7 of the Wisconsin Constitution states: In all criminal prosecutions the accused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16139 - 2017-09-21
State v. Andrew L. Phillips
of no contest, or of an offer to the court or prosecuting attorney to plead guilty or no contest to the crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7388 - 2005-03-31
of no contest, or of an offer to the court or prosecuting attorney to plead guilty or no contest to the crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7388 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, once prosecutive merit is found, is within the discretion of the juvenile court. Because the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109783 - 2014-04-01
, once prosecutive merit is found, is within the discretion of the juvenile court. Because the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109783 - 2014-04-01
[PDF]
State v. Stanley Montelius
violates his due process rights, it should not be applied in criminal prosecutions, and it should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5133 - 2017-09-19
violates his due process rights, it should not be applied in criminal prosecutions, and it should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5133 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Donald A. Bratrud
and whether he understood he was being prosecuted in Wisconsin. Bratrud responded that he understood he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10082 - 2017-09-19
and whether he understood he was being prosecuted in Wisconsin. Bratrud responded that he understood he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10082 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
] prosecution at trial at which the defendant was acquitted.” ¶12 The Wisconsin Supreme Court recognized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90208 - 2014-09-15
] prosecution at trial at which the defendant was acquitted.” ¶12 The Wisconsin Supreme Court recognized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90208 - 2014-09-15
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Albert J. Armonda
no evidentiary value and is without prejudice to the respondent's defense of the proceeding or the prosecution
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16791 - 2005-03-31
no evidentiary value and is without prejudice to the respondent's defense of the proceeding or the prosecution
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16791 - 2005-03-31
State v. Boyd W. Pigman
prosecution for offenses involving intoxicated use of a vehicle. … [W]e hold that if evidence is otherwise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4360 - 2005-03-31
prosecution for offenses involving intoxicated use of a vehicle. … [W]e hold that if evidence is otherwise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4360 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
“embod[y] three protections: ‘protection against a second prosecution for the same offense after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29629 - 2014-09-15
“embod[y] three protections: ‘protection against a second prosecution for the same offense after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29629 - 2014-09-15