Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2871 - 2880 of 58245 for speedy trial.
Search results 2871 - 2880 of 58245 for speedy trial.
State v. John A. Nutt
FINE, J. John A. Nutt appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court found him guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7472 - 2005-03-31
FINE, J. John A. Nutt appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court found him guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7472 - 2005-03-31
Jay R. Sorensen v. Terri Lynn Schnorr-Sorensen
on the reasonable inferences from the evidence presented to the circuit court at the trial and that the later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13827 - 2005-03-31
on the reasonable inferences from the evidence presented to the circuit court at the trial and that the later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13827 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Hector J. Boissonneault
on him were excessive, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance at sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11748 - 2017-09-20
on him were excessive, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance at sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11748 - 2017-09-20
State v. Daniel G.H.
that because Daniel did not have a right to a jury trial, its decision was not binding. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3630 - 2005-03-31
that because Daniel did not have a right to a jury trial, its decision was not binding. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3630 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael V. Hendricks
three trial court orders, including an order denying Hendricks’ motion to reopen his operating while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18615 - 2017-09-21
three trial court orders, including an order denying Hendricks’ motion to reopen his operating while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18615 - 2017-09-21
Jay Richard Sorensen v. Terri Lynn Schnorr-Sorensen
on the reasonable inferences from the evidence presented to the circuit court at the trial and that the later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13328 - 2005-03-31
on the reasonable inferences from the evidence presented to the circuit court at the trial and that the later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13328 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael V. Hendricks
On February 4, 2003, this court issued an opinion that addressed three trial court orders, including an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18615 - 2005-06-20
On February 4, 2003, this court issued an opinion that addressed three trial court orders, including an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18615 - 2005-06-20
State v. Eugene Keeler
the legal test barring retrials has not been met. The trial court concluded that any prosecutorial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15118 - 2005-03-31
the legal test barring retrials has not been met. The trial court concluded that any prosecutorial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15118 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Daniel G.H.
obligation. The State cross-appeals and argues that because Daniel did not have a right to a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3630 - 2017-09-19
obligation. The State cross-appeals and argues that because Daniel did not have a right to a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3630 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
permission to search his person or the vehicle. In an oral decision, the trial court denied Jones’s motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121750 - 2014-09-11
permission to search his person or the vehicle. In an oral decision, the trial court denied Jones’s motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121750 - 2014-09-11