Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28701 - 28710 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 28701 - 28710 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. Derrick Sandles
Sandles moved for sentence modification, claiming that the trial court’s misinterpretation of the concepts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21257 - 2006-02-06
Sandles moved for sentence modification, claiming that the trial court’s misinterpretation of the concepts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21257 - 2006-02-06
State v. William Wilson Gordon
to discredit Misty’s testimony that he was uncircumcised, and thus to discredit the credibility of her claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12843 - 2005-03-31
to discredit Misty’s testimony that he was uncircumcised, and thus to discredit the credibility of her claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12843 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Employers Mutual Companies v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
-3181 4 “The Department has a long standing policy that the person making the claim has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14751 - 2017-09-21
-3181 4 “The Department has a long standing policy that the person making the claim has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14751 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jonathan P. Cole
modification, claiming that a new factor existed that justified reducing his sentence. The trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9888 - 2005-03-31
modification, claiming that a new factor existed that justified reducing his sentence. The trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9888 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jonathan P. Cole
, claiming that a new factor existed that justified reducing his sentence. The trial court denied Cole's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9888 - 2017-09-19
, claiming that a new factor existed that justified reducing his sentence. The trial court denied Cole's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9888 - 2017-09-19
Washington County v. Richard E. Hupfer
contrary to § 346.63(1)(b), Stats.[1] Hupfer now appeals, claiming that the arresting officer lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11665 - 2005-03-31
contrary to § 346.63(1)(b), Stats.[1] Hupfer now appeals, claiming that the arresting officer lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11665 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, claiming a new factor. Specifically, he alleged that co-actor Michael Chisem told a defense investigator
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80189 - 2012-04-02
, claiming a new factor. Specifically, he alleged that co-actor Michael Chisem told a defense investigator
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80189 - 2012-04-02
Nanci Brisbane v. Peter J. Vallecillo
claimed Vallecillo had thrown two twenty-pound planters at her. Second, she claimed that Vallecillo had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4417 - 2005-03-31
claimed Vallecillo had thrown two twenty-pound planters at her. Second, she claimed that Vallecillo had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4417 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Stephen V. Hannigan v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
. Stephen Hannigan appeals a summary judgment dismissing his claims under §§ 146.81-84 and 51.30
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14494 - 2017-09-21
. Stephen Hannigan appeals a summary judgment dismissing his claims under §§ 146.81-84 and 51.30
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14494 - 2017-09-21
State v. Craig L. Miller
claims. Miller argues that his right to be free from double jeopardy was violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3348 - 2005-03-31
claims. Miller argues that his right to be free from double jeopardy was violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3348 - 2005-03-31