Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28701 - 28710 of 39104 for c's.
Search results 28701 - 28710 of 39104 for c's.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶18 Here, we agree with the circuit court that trial counsel’s performance was deficient. “[C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=391962 - 2021-07-21
. ¶18 Here, we agree with the circuit court that trial counsel’s performance was deficient. “[C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=391962 - 2021-07-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: PATRICK C. HAUGHNEY
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107796 - 2017-09-21
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: PATRICK C. HAUGHNEY
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107796 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is “highly deferential,” and “[c]ounsel enjoys a ‘strong presumption’ that his [or her] conduct ‘falls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=396873 - 2021-07-28
is “highly deferential,” and “[c]ounsel enjoys a ‘strong presumption’ that his [or her] conduct ‘falls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=396873 - 2021-07-28
COURT OF APPEALS
or on an event which may occur in the future. [C]ontingent claims which cannot be allowed as absolute must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76645 - 2012-01-17
or on an event which may occur in the future. [C]ontingent claims which cannot be allowed as absolute must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76645 - 2012-01-17
CA Blank Order
and that there is no basis to modify Reese’s sentence. C. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Counsel further states in his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144414 - 2015-07-09
and that there is no basis to modify Reese’s sentence. C. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Counsel further states in his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144414 - 2015-07-09
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 805.14(5)(d).[1] The motion also invoked § 805.14(5)(c) and requested, as an alternative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132048 - 2014-12-22
. Stat. § 805.14(5)(d).[1] The motion also invoked § 805.14(5)(c) and requested, as an alternative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132048 - 2014-12-22
COURT OF APPEALS
of the charges. C. Hearsay. ¶10 Orengo contends that his trial lawyer gave him ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78581 - 2012-03-07
of the charges. C. Hearsay. ¶10 Orengo contends that his trial lawyer gave him ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78581 - 2012-03-07
Nancy M. Bedora v. David L. Bedora
deductions withheld. On his income tax returns, Mr. Bedora did not take a deduction on his Schedule C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12879 - 2005-03-31
deductions withheld. On his income tax returns, Mr. Bedora did not take a deduction on his Schedule C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12879 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
N.E.M. v. Eugene Strigel
-0755(C) SUNDBY, J. (concurring). It is undisputed that the sexual assaults which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8782 - 2017-09-19
-0755(C) SUNDBY, J. (concurring). It is undisputed that the sexual assaults which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8782 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (2009-10). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72836 - 2014-09-15
pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (2009-10). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72836 - 2014-09-15