Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28701 - 28710 of 83284 for case search.
Search results 28701 - 28710 of 83284 for case search.
[PDF]
WI APP 247
2007 WI APP 247 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 2007AP135
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30551 - 2014-09-15
2007 WI APP 247 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 2007AP135
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30551 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of review in this case. “In deciding an appeal from a circuit court’s order affirming or reversing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78530 - 2012-02-22
of review in this case. “In deciding an appeal from a circuit court’s order affirming or reversing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78530 - 2012-02-22
[PDF]
WI 19
2013 WI 19 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2012AP1590-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93125 - 2014-09-15
2013 WI 19 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2012AP1590-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93125 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the court denied Charleston’s motion to dismiss, and the case was resolved on April 28, 2016, by plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197970 - 2017-10-18
, the court denied Charleston’s motion to dismiss, and the case was resolved on April 28, 2016, by plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197970 - 2017-10-18
The Estate of Martha Burgess v. Carl Peterson
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 96-1455 & 97
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10853 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 96-1455 & 97
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10853 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
),1 postconviction motion. We affirm. ¶2 The procedural background of this case is convoluted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=465710 - 2021-12-21
),1 postconviction motion. We affirm. ¶2 The procedural background of this case is convoluted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=465710 - 2021-12-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, was willing to take the case. However, while the attorney was solicited in November 2006, he informed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34503 - 2008-11-03
, was willing to take the case. However, while the attorney was solicited in November 2006, he informed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34503 - 2008-11-03
COURT OF APPEALS
was of no consequence in this case. DISCUSSION “Probable Cause to Believe” for PBT ¶9 Levasseur argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107792 - 2014-02-05
was of no consequence in this case. DISCUSSION “Probable Cause to Believe” for PBT ¶9 Levasseur argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107792 - 2014-02-05
COURT OF APPEALS
. The circuit court denied both requests, reasoning the parties were married, Scott was part of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82546 - 2012-05-14
. The circuit court denied both requests, reasoning the parties were married, Scott was part of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82546 - 2012-05-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the case, and the jury had been instructed and would be instructed again that each parent would receive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82546 - 2014-09-15
of the case, and the jury had been instructed and would be instructed again that each parent would receive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82546 - 2014-09-15