Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28711 - 28720 of 63536 for records.
Search results 28711 - 28720 of 63536 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725943 - 2023-11-09
reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725943 - 2023-11-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=533054 - 2022-06-22
and reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=533054 - 2022-06-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2019AP55-CRNM 2 response. Based upon our review of the no-merit report and the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246992 - 2019-09-16
. No. 2019AP55-CRNM 2 response. Based upon our review of the no-merit report and the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246992 - 2019-09-16
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
are to the 2023-24 version. Nos. 2025AP2787-NM 2025AP2788-NM 2 the Records and counsel’s report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069237 - 2026-01-28
are to the 2023-24 version. Nos. 2025AP2787-NM 2025AP2788-NM 2 the Records and counsel’s report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069237 - 2026-01-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. 2023AP1793-CRNM 2023AP1794-CRNM 2 independent review of the Records, this court concludes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=761414 - 2024-02-14
. 2023AP1793-CRNM 2023AP1794-CRNM 2 independent review of the Records, this court concludes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=761414 - 2024-02-14
[PDF]
State v. Randy D. Dziczkowski
incorrectly applied the law. Because the record shows that the trial court exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12996 - 2017-09-21
incorrectly applied the law. Because the record shows that the trial court exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12996 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=309048 - 2020-12-02
review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=309048 - 2020-12-02
State v. James Podlewski
in the record that remotely suggests that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in sentencing him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13719 - 2005-03-31
in the record that remotely suggests that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in sentencing him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13719 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response but has not done so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the Record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=773312 - 2024-03-13
a response but has not done so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the Record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=773312 - 2024-03-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response but has not done so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the Record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=773312 - 2024-03-13
a response but has not done so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the Record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=773312 - 2024-03-13