Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28731 - 28740 of 63789 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 28731 - 28740 of 63789 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
with a prohibited alcohol concentration (PAC) of .08% or more.[3] She filed a motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34466 - 2008-11-03
with a prohibited alcohol concentration (PAC) of .08% or more.[3] She filed a motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34466 - 2008-11-03
COURT OF APPEALS
without a warrant, the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the 275 grams of marijuana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59520 - 2009-11-24
without a warrant, the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the 275 grams of marijuana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59520 - 2009-11-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 802.06(2)(a)3. (2021-22).1 The motion alleged that Durga was formed in Georgia, has its principal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=799641 - 2024-05-15
. § 802.06(2)(a)3. (2021-22).1 The motion alleged that Durga was formed in Georgia, has its principal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=799641 - 2024-05-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
a warrant, the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the 275 grams of marijuana found in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59520 - 2014-09-15
a warrant, the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the 275 grams of marijuana found in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59520 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the order denying her postconviction motion for relief on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217675 - 2018-08-14
the order denying her postconviction motion for relief on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217675 - 2018-08-14
State v. Marshall R. Reese
(2) (2001–02). He also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Reese
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20870 - 2006-01-09
(2) (2001–02). He also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Reese
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20870 - 2006-01-09
[PDF]
Frontsheet
the foreclosure action. ¶7 In July 2009, after Attorney Nora had filed a number of motions and an answer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210465 - 2018-06-12
the foreclosure action. ¶7 In July 2009, after Attorney Nora had filed a number of motions and an answer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210465 - 2018-06-12
State v. Ronald V. McCallum
her accusation. Relying on H.L.’s recantation, McCallum filed a post-conviction motion to withdraw
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17021 - 2005-03-31
her accusation. Relying on H.L.’s recantation, McCallum filed a post-conviction motion to withdraw
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17021 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ronald V. McCallum
motion to withdraw his Alford plea. Concluding that H.L.’s recantation was “less credible” than her
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17021 - 2017-09-21
motion to withdraw his Alford plea. Concluding that H.L.’s recantation was “less credible” than her
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17021 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Richard F. Modica v. Doug Verhulst
., as to Verhulst because it did not state his name. The trial court granted the motion and dismissed the action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8188 - 2017-09-19
., as to Verhulst because it did not state his name. The trial court granted the motion and dismissed the action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8188 - 2017-09-19