Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28741 - 28750 of 63197 for records.
Search results 28741 - 28750 of 63197 for records.
COURT OF APPEALS
a factual finding unless it is clearly erroneous. Wis. Stat. ยง 805.17(2). We search the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63427 - 2011-05-02
a factual finding unless it is clearly erroneous. Wis. Stat. ยง 805.17(2). We search the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63427 - 2011-05-02
Rule Order
. 2. A written supplement to the record. (b) If the applicant does not request a hearing or file
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60735 - 2011-03-01
. 2. A written supplement to the record. (b) If the applicant does not request a hearing or file
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60735 - 2011-03-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and multiple county officials. Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=920874 - 2025-02-27
and multiple county officials. Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=920874 - 2025-02-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an order denying his postconviction motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207057 - 2018-01-11
and an order denying his postconviction motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207057 - 2018-01-11
[PDF]
State v. David W. Kalk
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10979 - 2017-09-19
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10979 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) to pertinent portions of the record and the application of governing legal authority, and I reject her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146733 - 2017-09-21
) to pertinent portions of the record and the application of governing legal authority, and I reject her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146733 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). 1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175697 - 2017-09-21
). 1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175697 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Town of Grand Chute v. Mark Harry Gabriel
and frustrated his right to present his pro se defense. This contention is almost specious. The record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12629 - 2017-09-21
and frustrated his right to present his pro se defense. This contention is almost specious. The record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12629 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708001 - 2023-09-27
of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708001 - 2023-09-27
State v. LaPonzo Monroe Dallas
and the appeal submitted to the court, the appellant moved to supplement the record. It appears that he moves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19523 - 2005-09-06
and the appeal submitted to the court, the appellant moved to supplement the record. It appears that he moves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19523 - 2005-09-06