Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28751 - 28760 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
Search results 28751 - 28760 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 18, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98255 - 2013-06-17
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 18, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98255 - 2013-06-17
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶13 Nonetheless, Davis argues this court may vacate the guilty verdict because “the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31127 - 2007-12-10
. ¶13 Nonetheless, Davis argues this court may vacate the guilty verdict because “the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31127 - 2007-12-10
COURT OF APPEALS
that his case would not be tried that day because counsel had already told the State and the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35068 - 2008-12-29
that his case would not be tried that day because counsel had already told the State and the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35068 - 2008-12-29
COURT OF APPEALS
PER CURIAM. Mary Jane Stephanek, pro se, appeals an order of the circuit court, dismissing her case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132838 - 2014-02-10
PER CURIAM. Mary Jane Stephanek, pro se, appeals an order of the circuit court, dismissing her case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132838 - 2014-02-10
COURT OF APPEALS
On March 21, 2011, Ward moved the circuit court in this case for sentence modification based on his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82322 - 2012-05-14
On March 21, 2011, Ward moved the circuit court in this case for sentence modification based on his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82322 - 2012-05-14
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 13, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34596 - 2008-11-12
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 13, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34596 - 2008-11-12
COURT OF APPEALS
and resisting an officer in Milwaukee County Circuit Court Case No. 2003CF2610. The trial court imposed nine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43579 - 2009-11-16
and resisting an officer in Milwaukee County Circuit Court Case No. 2003CF2610. The trial court imposed nine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43579 - 2009-11-16
COURT OF APPEALS
, clarifying the “seven/five” recommendation on case number 07-CF-85, the court accepted the agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36676 - 2009-06-09
, clarifying the “seven/five” recommendation on case number 07-CF-85, the court accepted the agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36676 - 2009-06-09
COURT OF APPEALS
not waive its jurisdictional objection. As a result, the circuit court order is affirmed and the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53101 - 2010-08-09
not waive its jurisdictional objection. As a result, the circuit court order is affirmed and the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53101 - 2010-08-09
COURT OF APPEALS
, the State asked the trial court for permission to reopen its case to introduce the recording of the 911 call
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108360 - 2014-02-24
, the State asked the trial court for permission to reopen its case to introduce the recording of the 911 call
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108360 - 2014-02-24