Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28751 - 28760 of 74552 for public records.
Search results 28751 - 28760 of 74552 for public records.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that it is within the power of the legislature to use a damages cap to preserve public funds by allowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122448 - 2014-09-25
that it is within the power of the legislature to use a damages cap to preserve public funds by allowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122448 - 2014-09-25
State v. Robert K.
court or during a telephone conference under s. 807.13 on the record and only for so long
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7641 - 2005-03-31
court or during a telephone conference under s. 807.13 on the record and only for so long
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7641 - 2005-03-31
Jeffrey J. Weber v. Dodge County Planning and Development Department
is the custodian of the records, but must go to the board or body whose acts are sought to be reviewed, otherwise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15444 - 2005-03-31
is the custodian of the records, but must go to the board or body whose acts are sought to be reviewed, otherwise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15444 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
disparaging remarks, public displays of temper, and passive-aggressive actions. No. 2017AP210 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208181 - 2018-02-14
disparaging remarks, public displays of temper, and passive-aggressive actions. No. 2017AP210 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208181 - 2018-02-14
State v. Laverne R. Burchard
discretion by denying Burchard’s postconviction motion because the record supports the denial. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6827 - 2005-03-31
discretion by denying Burchard’s postconviction motion because the record supports the denial. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6827 - 2005-03-31
State v. Christopher B. Cook
, reasonably inferable from the record, in a manner that supports the circuit court’s decision. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4351 - 2005-03-31
, reasonably inferable from the record, in a manner that supports the circuit court’s decision. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4351 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
report pursuant to SCR 22.17(2).[1] Upon our independent review of the record, we approve and adopt
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54058 - 2010-09-02
report pursuant to SCR 22.17(2).[1] Upon our independent review of the record, we approve and adopt
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54058 - 2010-09-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for No. 2020AP613
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522601 - 2022-05-17
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for No. 2020AP613
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522601 - 2022-05-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
postconviction motion for sentence modification. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111436 - 2017-09-21
postconviction motion for sentence modification. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111436 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
with Norfleet’s argument. ¶9 Contrary to Norfleet’s assertion, the record is unclear as to exactly when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110026 - 2014-04-08
with Norfleet’s argument. ¶9 Contrary to Norfleet’s assertion, the record is unclear as to exactly when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110026 - 2014-04-08