Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28751 - 28760 of 59387 for quit claim deed.
Search results 28751 - 28760 of 59387 for quit claim deed.
State v. Andrew M. Obriecht
had entered pursuant to the deferred prosecution agreement, and to modify his sentences. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15669 - 2005-03-31
had entered pursuant to the deferred prosecution agreement, and to modify his sentences. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15669 - 2005-03-31
State v. David W. Suchocki
the presentence investigation report and to order a new PSI prepared by a different agent. Suchocki claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10963 - 2005-03-31
the presentence investigation report and to order a new PSI prepared by a different agent. Suchocki claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10963 - 2005-03-31
State v. Matthew T. Doughty
for second-degree reckless homicide. Doughty also claims the sentence imposed was excessive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6617 - 2005-03-31
for second-degree reckless homicide. Doughty also claims the sentence imposed was excessive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6617 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Shirley A. Negley
. The Negleys claim that the trial court: (1) erred in holding that Mr. Negley was not entitled to a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11004 - 2017-09-19
. The Negleys claim that the trial court: (1) erred in holding that Mr. Negley was not entitled to a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11004 - 2017-09-19
City of Milwaukee v. Shirley A. Negley
claim that the trial court: (1) erred in holding that Mr. Negley was not entitled to a de novo trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11004 - 2005-03-31
claim that the trial court: (1) erred in holding that Mr. Negley was not entitled to a de novo trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11004 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, there is no arguable merit to a claim for plea withdrawal based on the assessment of mandatory DNA surcharges. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223762 - 2018-10-18
, there is no arguable merit to a claim for plea withdrawal based on the assessment of mandatory DNA surcharges. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223762 - 2018-10-18
[PDF]
State v. Patrick Greer
, and a subsequent order denying him postconviction relief. He claims that the circuit court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12385 - 2017-09-21
, and a subsequent order denying him postconviction relief. He claims that the circuit court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12385 - 2017-09-21
David Schultz v. Astrazeneca Insurance Company, Ltd.
on the job for his employer, Garst Seed Company. He and his wife, Vicki, claimed that Brian Schumacher
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21672 - 2006-03-07
on the job for his employer, Garst Seed Company. He and his wife, Vicki, claimed that Brian Schumacher
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21672 - 2006-03-07
Lafayette County Department of Human Services v. Stephen J.C.
of protection and services (CHIPS) under Wis. Stat. § 48.13. He claims that: (1) the circuit court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2173 - 2005-03-31
of protection and services (CHIPS) under Wis. Stat. § 48.13. He claims that: (1) the circuit court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2173 - 2005-03-31
Lafayette County Department of Human Services v. Stephen J.C.
of protection and services (CHIPS) under Wis. Stat. § 48.13. He claims that: (1) the circuit court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2172 - 2005-03-31
of protection and services (CHIPS) under Wis. Stat. § 48.13. He claims that: (1) the circuit court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2172 - 2005-03-31