Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28761 - 28770 of 30177 for de.

[PDF] State v. David S. Leighton
the right to a speedy trial is a constitutional question that this court reviews de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16075 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and applicable law Right to a speedy trial ¶17 We review de novo the question of law of whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237927 - 2019-03-26

[PDF] State v. William J. Church
violate the Fifth Amendment protection against double jeopardy is a question of law which we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13199 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Metropolitan Ventures, LLC v. GEA Associates
reversed by the court of appeals. We review summary judgment decisions de novo, benefiting from
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25536 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Frontsheet
review de novo. See Bauer v. Wis. Energy Corp., 2022 WI 11, ¶11, 400 Wis. 2d 592, 970 N.W.2d 243
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=540680 - 2022-08-26

[PDF] Anthony R. Anderson v. MSI Preferred Insurance Company
presents a question of law we review de novo. German v. DOT, 2000 WI 62, ¶7, 235 Wis. 2d 576, 612 N.W
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18401 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the interpretation and application of § 971.14 de novo. See Kieninger v. Crown Equip. Corp., 2019 WI 27, ¶12, 386
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=585965 - 2022-11-10

[PDF] Jerold J. Mackenzie v. Miller Brewing Company
a cause of action in tort is a question of law subject to de novo review. Slawek v. Stroh, 62 Wis. 2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17330 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Richard Knutson, Inc.
management took no action to have the power lines de-energized or barriers erected; rather, management
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7704 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
appellate court reviews a [circuit] court’s application of WIS. STAT. § 907.02(1) de novo while benefiting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1058787 - 2026-01-06