Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28761 - 28770 of 68869 for he.
Search results 28761 - 28770 of 68869 for he.
State v. Lothar W. Penkert
for reconsideration.[1] He raises the following issues: (1) that he has an “inalienable right” to travel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11972 - 2005-03-31
for reconsideration.[1] He raises the following issues: (1) that he has an “inalienable right” to travel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11972 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gabriel J. Alwin
guilty and no contest pleas were not knowingly entered because he mistakenly believed he was eligible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10865 - 2005-03-31
guilty and no contest pleas were not knowingly entered because he mistakenly believed he was eligible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10865 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ann K. Beglinger
a speeding offense when he asked the defendant to perform field sobriety tests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8429 - 2005-03-31
a speeding offense when he asked the defendant to perform field sobriety tests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8429 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kory J. Malcheski
offense, and the court order suspending his license on the ground that he had refused to submit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4826 - 2017-09-19
offense, and the court order suspending his license on the ground that he had refused to submit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4826 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 At the suppression hearing, officer Dan Glaze testified he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88591 - 2012-10-22
disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 At the suppression hearing, officer Dan Glaze testified he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88591 - 2012-10-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. He alleges the existence of a new factor. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=753660 - 2024-01-24
. He alleges the existence of a new factor. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=753660 - 2024-01-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conduct with the habitual offender penalty enhancer. In August 2017, he was sentenced to ten years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=454111 - 2021-11-23
conduct with the habitual offender penalty enhancer. In August 2017, he was sentenced to ten years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=454111 - 2021-11-23
COURT OF APPEALS
to the incident leading to his detention, Harlan had told his wife that people were trying to harm her. He put
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76827 - 2012-01-24
to the incident leading to his detention, Harlan had told his wife that people were trying to harm her. He put
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76827 - 2012-01-24
[PDF]
State v. John W. Christ
present motion because he failed to show that he could not have raised his issues when he appealed. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19850 - 2017-09-21
present motion because he failed to show that he could not have raised his issues when he appealed. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19850 - 2017-09-21
State v. John W. Christ
Christ’s present motion because he failed to show that he could not have raised his issues when he appealed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19850 - 2005-10-05
Christ’s present motion because he failed to show that he could not have raised his issues when he appealed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19850 - 2005-10-05