Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28761 - 28770 of 67825 for law.

2009 WI APP 107
. And if you became a law-abiding, good citizen, then you would never have been here … but if you screwed up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36536 - 2009-07-28

[PDF] State v. Perk E. Thomas
the deficiency or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14969 - 2017-09-21

State v. Andre D. Mitchell
question of law and fact. See State v. Santiago, 206 Wis.2d 3, 18, 556 N.W.2d 687, 692 (1996). While we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12705 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Robert H. Miller
blood sample taken at the direction of a law enforcement officer is permissible under the following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5742 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Joseph P. Sepanek, Jr. v. M & I Bank of Burlington
of law which we review de novo by applying the same standards employed by the trial court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11238 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Waukesha County v. Albert A. Tadych
. Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review without deference to the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7761 - 2017-09-19

State v. Demetrius Newman
is prohibited by case law. Finally, he claims that the trial court erred in taking judicial notice of Bridges’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13946 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Wayne F. Schrubbe v. Peninsula Veterinary Service, Inc.
of damages applicable to a specific claim presents a question of law. Hills Bros. Coffee, Inc. v. Dairyland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9893 - 2017-09-19

State v. Walter F. Cline
. But, we review questions of law or constitutional fact independently. See id. at 344. Using the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16045 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Danny R. Peterson v. Midwest Security Insurance Company
of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See id. at 496-97; see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16203 - 2017-09-21