Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28771 - 28780 of 46884 for WA 0852 2611 9277 [[GLORION]] Jasa Pemborong Set Kamar Tidur Apartment Gunung Putri Square Bogor.

[PDF] NOTICE
not support his position. Batson appeals. ¶4 A new factor is “a fact or set of facts highly relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33531 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). The no-merit report sets forth the procedural history of the case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238272 - 2019-03-27

[PDF] Charles Britton v. Bonny Britton
its discretion when it set maintenance at $250 per month. WISCONSIN STAT. § 767.26(10) (1999-2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4517 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2010AP1719-CR 3 the court having the discretion to set a parole eligibility date after twenty years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70913 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
this diagnosis is a new factor that entitled him to sentence modification. A “new factor” is “‘a fact or set
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271656 - 2020-07-28

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that is the subject of this appeal. She sets forth no arguments applying the applicable legal authority
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271676 - 2020-07-23

[PDF] State v. Robert Anthony Joshua
factor” is a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition of sentence, but not known
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18454 - 2017-09-21

County of Dane v. Donald G. Blatterman
admissible at a trial. For a breath test to be admissible, the procedures set out in § 343.305(6)(c) must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9360 - 2005-03-31

State v. David P. Byrne
of statutes specifically set forth in its subsection but fourth-degree sexual assault is “conspicuously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5344 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
that King qualified as a repeat offender. The court was not required to recite magic words to set forth its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133272 - 2015-01-20