Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28771 - 28780 of 63537 for records.
Search results 28771 - 28780 of 63537 for records.
Elaine M. Parodo v. Jerry J. Parodo
reasoning, we independently review the record to determine whether it provides a basis for the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4736 - 2005-03-31
reasoning, we independently review the record to determine whether it provides a basis for the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4736 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Barba filed a response. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93985 - 2013-03-12
] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Barba filed a response. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93985 - 2013-03-12
CA Blank Order
] Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92674 - 2013-02-12
] Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92674 - 2013-02-12
COURT OF APPEALS
completion of high school, his employment history, his extensive criminal record including prior drug
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123121 - 2014-10-06
completion of high school, his employment history, his extensive criminal record including prior drug
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123121 - 2014-10-06
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
to file a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the Record and counsel’s report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1061968 - 2026-01-14
to file a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the Record and counsel’s report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1061968 - 2026-01-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and our independent review of the record revealed a potential issue arising from the circuit court’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174780 - 2017-09-21
, and our independent review of the record revealed a potential issue arising from the circuit court’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174780 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewing the entire record, 1 All references
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125431 - 2017-09-21
reviewing the entire record, 1 All references
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125431 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375649 - 2021-06-10
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375649 - 2021-06-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=309048 - 2020-12-02
review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=309048 - 2020-12-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and supplemental no-merit report, as well as our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=962535 - 2025-05-30
and supplemental no-merit report, as well as our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=962535 - 2025-05-30