Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28781 - 28790 of 62077 for child support.
Search results 28781 - 28790 of 62077 for child support.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was not supported by the evidence. We agree the court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130755 - 2017-09-21
was not supported by the evidence. We agree the court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130755 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Ronald C. Foust
in violation of the defendant's right to counsel if the prior conviction is used to support guilt or enhance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12105 - 2014-09-15
in violation of the defendant's right to counsel if the prior conviction is used to support guilt or enhance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12105 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the victim’s condition. ¶4 Thomas did not offer any evidence in support of his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73304 - 2014-09-15
the victim’s condition. ¶4 Thomas did not offer any evidence in support of his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73304 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
The court’s findings are supported by the record and are not clearly erroneous. Counsel provided the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39049 - 2009-08-10
The court’s findings are supported by the record and are not clearly erroneous. Counsel provided the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39049 - 2009-08-10
COURT OF APPEALS
to support his claim. ¶12 The circuit court found that counsel provided an opinion, a prediction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30629 - 2007-10-22
to support his claim. ¶12 The circuit court found that counsel provided an opinion, a prediction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30629 - 2007-10-22
Michael A. Downey v. John P. Kendall
court’s decision as not supported by the evidence. We reject his claims and affirm that portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9436 - 2005-03-31
court’s decision as not supported by the evidence. We reject his claims and affirm that portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9436 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in an effort to support Collison’s position that his property had no market value. The City’s assessor also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121184 - 2005-09-08
in an effort to support Collison’s position that his property had no market value. The City’s assessor also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121184 - 2005-09-08
COURT OF APPEALS
. Peters also argues that his arrest for obstruction was not supported by probable cause. He asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32802 - 2015-05-27
. Peters also argues that his arrest for obstruction was not supported by probable cause. He asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32802 - 2015-05-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
raises self-defense to a homicide and “there is a factual basis to support such defense, the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=832668 - 2024-07-31
raises self-defense to a homicide and “there is a factual basis to support such defense, the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=832668 - 2024-07-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
alleges that the court erred in not considering Michael’s earning capacity and ability to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919207 - 2025-02-27
alleges that the court erred in not considering Michael’s earning capacity and ability to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919207 - 2025-02-27