Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28781 - 28790 of 29965 for de.
Search results 28781 - 28790 of 29965 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 9, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
the defense are questions of law, which we decide de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634, 369 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27092 - 2006-11-08
the defense are questions of law, which we decide de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634, 369 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27092 - 2006-11-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Bentley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502043 - 2022-03-28
, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Bentley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502043 - 2022-03-28
[PDF]
WI 48
This case requires statutory interpretation, and the standard of review for statutory interpretation is de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36806 - 2014-09-15
This case requires statutory interpretation, and the standard of review for statutory interpretation is de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36806 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=382079 - 2021-06-29
a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=382079 - 2021-06-29
[PDF]
State v. Edward J. E.
to undisputed facts de novo. See State v. Peters, 166 Wis. 2d 168, 175, 479 Nos. 02-1613-CR 02-1614-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5368 - 2017-09-19
to undisputed facts de novo. See State v. Peters, 166 Wis. 2d 168, 175, 479 Nos. 02-1613-CR 02-1614-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5368 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
constitutional minimums is a question of law we review de novo. Id. To prove ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209744 - 2018-03-15
constitutional minimums is a question of law we review de novo. Id. To prove ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209744 - 2018-03-15
[PDF]
SCR CHAPTER 31
����������� � ��Qù�ú�ò îBó�DE��ïrô ö����)CÖò ò���ô ÷BóÊú�FHG�ô����ýó�F�F�� �ã÷BïYõ5í.�� ¿ðBóÊò�óñ÷Børó�� ï' 7óñ
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35168 - 2014-09-15
����������� � ��Qù�ú�ò îBó�DE��ïrô ö����)CÖò ò���ô ÷BóÊú�FHG�ô����ýó�F�F�� �ã÷BïYõ5í.�� ¿ðBóÊò�óñ÷Børó�� ï' 7óñ
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35168 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI 81
reviewed all of Gittel's arguments de novo and decided them against Gittel.3 3
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33324 - 2014-09-15
reviewed all of Gittel's arguments de novo and decided them against Gittel.3 3
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33324 - 2014-09-15
State v. Larry A. Tiepelman
is a constitutional issue that an appellate court reviews de novo. Coolidge, 173 Wis. 2d at 789. ¶10
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25474 - 2006-06-08
is a constitutional issue that an appellate court reviews de novo. Coolidge, 173 Wis. 2d at 789. ¶10
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25474 - 2006-06-08
COURT OF APPEALS
). Determining whether an error is harmless presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Mark
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85453 - 2012-07-25
). Determining whether an error is harmless presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Mark
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85453 - 2012-07-25