Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28781 - 28790 of 29962 for de.
Search results 28781 - 28790 of 29962 for de.
Melvin D. Pulver v. David G. Jennings
, as Jennings asserts, is a question of law, which we review de novo. See Ellsworth v. Schelbrock, 2000 WI 63
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3086 - 2005-03-31
, as Jennings asserts, is a question of law, which we review de novo. See Ellsworth v. Schelbrock, 2000 WI 63
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3086 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
summary judgment presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo, applying the well-established
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64719 - 2011-05-23
summary judgment presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo, applying the well-established
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64719 - 2011-05-23
Frontsheet
interpretation, and the standard of review for statutory interpretation is de novo. DOR v. Menasha Corp., 2008
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36806 - 2009-06-15
interpretation, and the standard of review for statutory interpretation is de novo. DOR v. Menasha Corp., 2008
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36806 - 2009-06-15
[PDF]
State v. Vairin M.
." Wis. Stat. § 938.18(6). ¶22 Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16485 - 2017-09-21
." Wis. Stat. § 938.18(6). ¶22 Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16485 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Margaret M. Sopha v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation
as the circuit court. Although we review the motion for summary judgment de novo, we benefit from
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17400 - 2017-09-21
as the circuit court. Although we review the motion for summary judgment de novo, we benefit from
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17400 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frederic L. Chase v. Chase Lumber and Fuel Company, Inc.
, subject to de novo review. See Foursquare Properties Joint Venture I v. Johnny’s Loaf No. 98-0532
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14213 - 2014-09-15
, subject to de novo review. See Foursquare Properties Joint Venture I v. Johnny’s Loaf No. 98-0532
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14213 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Bentley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502043 - 2022-03-28
, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Bentley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502043 - 2022-03-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
No. 2017AP1216 6 interpretations of law and review de novo questions of statutory interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233699 - 2019-01-31
No. 2017AP1216 6 interpretations of law and review de novo questions of statutory interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233699 - 2019-01-31
Frontsheet
issues, all of which are reviewed de novo. Custodian of Records for the LTSB v. State, 2004 WI 65, ¶6
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37441 - 2009-07-08
issues, all of which are reviewed de novo. Custodian of Records for the LTSB v. State, 2004 WI 65, ¶6
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37441 - 2009-07-08
Milwaukee Regional Medical Center v. City of Wauwatosa
, or, alternatively, under § 70.11(4). Our review is de novo. See Trustees of Ind. Univ. v. Town of Rhine, 170 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25596 - 2006-07-25
, or, alternatively, under § 70.11(4). Our review is de novo. See Trustees of Ind. Univ. v. Town of Rhine, 170 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25596 - 2006-07-25