Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28781 - 28790 of 43324 for legal seperation.

[PDF] State v. James L. Neeley
exercised its discretion in accordance with accepted legal standards and the facts of record. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13016 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Jerod J. Bins
himself.” ¶11 Our prior decision is the law of the case. A decision on a legal issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4061 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Stephen E. Lee
of conviction are of no legal effect. We vacate the sentencing provisions of the amended judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5946 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Rosemary J. Dudzik
the purpose of resolving the ambiguity and establishing whether the activity is legal or illegal. Jackson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6269 - 2017-09-19

Brown County Department of Human Services v. Rochelle D.
, the child's parent, guardian or legal custodian, the expectant mother or the unborn child by the unborn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3704 - 2005-03-31

John E. Joyce v. Anne E. Whiteagle
$25,000 from the trust account and received a $4,000 payment for legal services performed for Timothy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9212 - 2005-03-31

Frontsheet
in outstanding legal fees when in fact only $1,285 was due. The circuit court found insufficient evidence
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30899 - 2007-11-13

[PDF] CA Blank Order
not address the legal significance, if any, of the failure to have the 2010 transcript prepared before
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159644 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Paul Fochs v. John Buch
if the court considered facts of record and its reasoning results in a rational and legally sound decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13928 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Janice D.
: “A decision on the merits of this dispute can have no practical legal effect upon any existing controversy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6781 - 2017-09-20