Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28791 - 28800 of 29966 for de.
Search results 28791 - 28800 of 29966 for de.
Darryn Reid v. Leanna R. Benz
] II ¶12 We review the circuit court's decision to award Benz attorney fees de novo. "Whether
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16344 - 2005-03-31
] II ¶12 We review the circuit court's decision to award Benz attorney fees de novo. "Whether
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16344 - 2005-03-31
State v. Larry A. Tiepelman
is a constitutional issue that an appellate court reviews de novo. Coolidge, 173 Wis. 2d at 789. ¶10
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25474 - 2006-06-08
is a constitutional issue that an appellate court reviews de novo. Coolidge, 173 Wis. 2d at 789. ¶10
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25474 - 2006-06-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
was deficient and whether that behavior prejudiced the defense are questions of law, which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27092 - 2014-09-15
was deficient and whether that behavior prejudiced the defense are questions of law, which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27092 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 69
that we review de novo. State v. Stewart, 2018 WI App 41, ¶18, 383 Wis. 2d 546, 916 N.W.2d 188; State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1015218 - 2025-12-17
that we review de novo. State v. Stewart, 2018 WI App 41, ¶18, 383 Wis. 2d 546, 916 N.W.2d 188; State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1015218 - 2025-12-17
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. David L. Ham
241, 243, 562 N.W.2d 137 (1997). The referee's conclusions of law, however, are subject to de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24713 - 2006-04-04
241, 243, 562 N.W.2d 137 (1997). The referee's conclusions of law, however, are subject to de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24713 - 2006-04-04
[PDF]
while we are reviewing a circuit court’s exercise of discretion,” we review that issue de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040736 - 2025-11-20
while we are reviewing a circuit court’s exercise of discretion,” we review that issue de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040736 - 2025-11-20
State v. James E. Brown
de novo. See State v. Brandt, 226 Wis. 2d 610, 618, 594 N.W.2d 759 (1999). Likewise, whether Brown
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25868 - 2006-07-11
de novo. See State v. Brandt, 226 Wis. 2d 610, 618, 594 N.W.2d 759 (1999). Likewise, whether Brown
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25868 - 2006-07-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a constitutional question that this court reviews de novo.” Leighton, 237 Wis. 2d No. 2015AP522-CR 16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150600 - 2017-09-21
is a constitutional question that this court reviews de novo.” Leighton, 237 Wis. 2d No. 2015AP522-CR 16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150600 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63192 - 2011-04-25
review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63192 - 2011-04-25
[PDF]
State v. Vanessa D. Hughes
then independently apply the law to those facts de novo. State v. Kiekhefer, 212 Wis. 2d 460, 475, 569 N.W.2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17249 - 2017-09-21
then independently apply the law to those facts de novo. State v. Kiekhefer, 212 Wis. 2d 460, 475, 569 N.W.2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17249 - 2017-09-21