Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28791 - 28800 of 29957 for de.
Search results 28791 - 28800 of 29957 for de.
Frontsheet
interpretation, and the standard of review for statutory interpretation is de novo. DOR v. Menasha Corp., 2008
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36806 - 2009-06-15
interpretation, and the standard of review for statutory interpretation is de novo. DOR v. Menasha Corp., 2008
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36806 - 2009-06-15
[PDF]
State v. Vairin M.
." Wis. Stat. § 938.18(6). ¶22 Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16485 - 2017-09-21
." Wis. Stat. § 938.18(6). ¶22 Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16485 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
and 66.0703(1)(a). The interpretation of statutes presents a question of law we review de novo. State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210574 - 2018-05-18
and 66.0703(1)(a). The interpretation of statutes presents a question of law we review de novo. State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210574 - 2018-05-18
[PDF]
Margaret M. Sopha v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation
as the circuit court. Although we review the motion for summary judgment de novo, we benefit from
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17400 - 2017-09-21
as the circuit court. Although we review the motion for summary judgment de novo, we benefit from
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17400 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frederic L. Chase v. Chase Lumber and Fuel Company, Inc.
, subject to de novo review. See Foursquare Properties Joint Venture I v. Johnny’s Loaf No. 98-0532
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14213 - 2014-09-15
, subject to de novo review. See Foursquare Properties Joint Venture I v. Johnny’s Loaf No. 98-0532
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14213 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Bentley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502043 - 2022-03-28
, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Bentley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502043 - 2022-03-28
[PDF]
State v. Edward J. E.
to undisputed facts de novo. See State v. Peters, 166 Wis. 2d 168, 175, 479 Nos. 02-1613-CR 02-1614-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5369 - 2017-09-19
to undisputed facts de novo. See State v. Peters, 166 Wis. 2d 168, 175, 479 Nos. 02-1613-CR 02-1614-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5369 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
No. 2017AP1216 6 interpretations of law and review de novo questions of statutory interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233699 - 2019-01-31
No. 2017AP1216 6 interpretations of law and review de novo questions of statutory interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233699 - 2019-01-31
Frontsheet
issues, all of which are reviewed de novo. Custodian of Records for the LTSB v. State, 2004 WI 65, ¶6
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37441 - 2009-07-08
issues, all of which are reviewed de novo. Custodian of Records for the LTSB v. State, 2004 WI 65, ¶6
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37441 - 2009-07-08
[PDF]
WI APP 69
that we review de novo. State v. Stewart, 2018 WI App 41, ¶18, 383 Wis. 2d 546, 916 N.W.2d 188; State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1015218 - 2025-12-17
that we review de novo. State v. Stewart, 2018 WI App 41, ¶18, 383 Wis. 2d 546, 916 N.W.2d 188; State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1015218 - 2025-12-17