Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2881 - 2890 of 69863 for his.
Search results 2881 - 2890 of 69863 for his.
COURT OF APPEALS
him in contempt; his former wife’s contempt motion was barred by the doctrines of laches, estoppel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79060 - 2012-03-05
him in contempt; his former wife’s contempt motion was barred by the doctrines of laches, estoppel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79060 - 2012-03-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and armed robbery with the use of force. He also appeals portions of orders denying his motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=753461 - 2024-01-23
and armed robbery with the use of force. He also appeals portions of orders denying his motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=753461 - 2024-01-23
[PDF]
a judgment of conviction and the order denying his postconviction motion for resentencing. On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=917568 - 2025-02-20
a judgment of conviction and the order denying his postconviction motion for resentencing. On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=917568 - 2025-02-20
State v. Charles Hudson
the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues: (1) that he was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13703 - 2005-03-31
the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues: (1) that he was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13703 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lawrence M. Ventrice
conclude that § 346.63(2)(a) does not preclude a coercion defense and that Ventrice satisfied his burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4042 - 2005-03-31
conclude that § 346.63(2)(a) does not preclude a coercion defense and that Ventrice satisfied his burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4042 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2023AP1064 2023AP1065 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Antonio Marques Smith appeals his judgments of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=906445 - 2025-01-28
2023AP1064 2023AP1065 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Antonio Marques Smith appeals his judgments of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=906445 - 2025-01-28
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. ¶2 This appeal raises the following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26853 - 2006-10-18
appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. ¶2 This appeal raises the following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26853 - 2006-10-18
[PDF]
State v. Jerome Sellars
in violation of § 161.573, STATS. He also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12792 - 2017-09-21
in violation of § 161.573, STATS. He also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12792 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jerome Sellars
order denying his motion for postconviction relief. On appeal, Sellars contends that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12792 - 2005-03-31
order denying his motion for postconviction relief. On appeal, Sellars contends that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12792 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Larry D. Benoit
He asserts dozens of claimed evidentiary, legal and constitutional errors during the course of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7853 - 2017-09-19
He asserts dozens of claimed evidentiary, legal and constitutional errors during the course of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7853 - 2017-09-19