Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28821 - 28830 of 34008 for dismissed.
Search results 28821 - 28830 of 34008 for dismissed.
State v. Michael E.H.
the financial ability to pay the restitution. The State counters that the appeal should be dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12323 - 2005-03-31
the financial ability to pay the restitution. The State counters that the appeal should be dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12323 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a sex crime and one count of possessing child pornography. The State moved to dismiss and read
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191380 - 2017-09-21
a sex crime and one count of possessing child pornography. The State moved to dismiss and read
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191380 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Brian T. Ladwig
the truck from being damaged. ¶7 Ladwig entered a no contest plea and the State agreed to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14522 - 2017-09-21
the truck from being damaged. ¶7 Ladwig entered a no contest plea and the State agreed to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14522 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Andre D. Crockett
) of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, which states that a judge may dismiss a successive petition when “new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3247 - 2017-09-19
) of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, which states that a judge may dismiss a successive petition when “new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3247 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. George Mason
: A court may not dismiss a case, refuse a filing or strike a pleading for failure of a party to use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5714 - 2017-09-19
: A court may not dismiss a case, refuse a filing or strike a pleading for failure of a party to use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5714 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
may not dismiss a statement from an opinion by this court by concluding that it is dictum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815731 - 2024-06-19
may not dismiss a statement from an opinion by this court by concluding that it is dictum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815731 - 2024-06-19
Dave Flores v. Jack Raz
judgment and dismissed Raz’s counterclaim, concluding that the Board’s approval of the sale was an implied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3884 - 2005-03-31
judgment and dismissed Raz’s counterclaim, concluding that the Board’s approval of the sale was an implied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3884 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Lamb renewed her motion to suppress at the bench trial and it was again dismissed. The court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43703 - 2009-11-18
. Lamb renewed her motion to suppress at the bench trial and it was again dismissed. The court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43703 - 2009-11-18
COURT OF APPEALS
. Bradley Allen appeals a summary judgment dismissing his prescriptive easement claim against the Woelfel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96815 - 2013-05-13
. Bradley Allen appeals a summary judgment dismissing his prescriptive easement claim against the Woelfel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96815 - 2013-05-13
Graeme J. Paxton v. Vulcan Basement Waterproofing Company of Wisconsin, Inc.
also contends that the Paxtons’ cause of action under Wis. Stat. § 100.18 should have been dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15379 - 2005-03-31
also contends that the Paxtons’ cause of action under Wis. Stat. § 100.18 should have been dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15379 - 2005-03-31