Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28831 - 28840 of 68246 for law.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
erroneously exercised its discretion by failing to apply “all the necessary factors of federal law, state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=954933 - 2025-05-13

[PDF] JD-1790T Order for Change in Placement (Out-of-Home to Out-of-Home Placement Only)
, pursuant to §48.13(2), Wis. Stats., or a comparable state or federal law. you intentionally abandoned
/formdisplay/JD-1790T.pdf?formNumber=JD-1790T&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-11-25

Edwin Tallard v. Northern States Power Company
. The court concluded as a matter of law that the Tallards had constructive notice of the contents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12263 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Gilbert Rodriguez
, is a question of law which appellate courts decide without deference to the trial court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9476 - 2017-09-19

State v. Curtis W.Ross
Ineffective assistance of counsel claims present mixed questions of law and fact. See State v. Pitsch, 124
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16126 - 2005-03-31

Bettendorf Transfer, Inc. v. Madison Freight Systems, Inc.
was responsible for determining the fees and relied on its common law authority to determine the reasonableness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5907 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] City of Milwaukee v. Michael Frank Machnitzky
which “in no way complies with the letter or spirit of the law,” the municipal court did not make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12957 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] James M. Povolny v. James B. Totzke
and law. The trial court made certain findings regarding the road’s condition and use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5883 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to interpret statutes, which presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Stewart, 2018
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1082075 - 2026-02-24

[PDF] State v. Joseph Keepers
). However, proof of either the deficiency or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2284 - 2017-09-19