Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28841 - 28850 of 74553 for public records.
Search results 28841 - 28850 of 74553 for public records.
Deutsches Land, Inc. v. City of Glendale
of law under Deutsches Land I, or as a matter of fact based on the undisputed summary judgment record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19038 - 2005-07-18
of law under Deutsches Land I, or as a matter of fact based on the undisputed summary judgment record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19038 - 2005-07-18
[PDF]
Deutsches Land, Inc. v. City of Glendale
record—and properly granted summary judgment to the City. ¶3 Because: (1) this court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19038 - 2017-09-21
record—and properly granted summary judgment to the City. ¶3 Because: (1) this court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19038 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
approved the Montana Avenue CSM on May 17, 2005, and it was recorded on June 17, 2005. According
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35455 - 2014-09-15
approved the Montana Avenue CSM on May 17, 2005, and it was recorded on June 17, 2005. According
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35455 - 2014-09-15
Patricia K. Bernhardt v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
by any credible evidence in the record. On appeal, this court reviews the decisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10149 - 2005-03-31
by any credible evidence in the record. On appeal, this court reviews the decisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10149 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ismet D. Divanovic
of counsel for Divanovic was by court appointment, not public No. 95-0881-CR -3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8843 - 2017-09-19
of counsel for Divanovic was by court appointment, not public No. 95-0881-CR -3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8843 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, and therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The following facts are taken from the record and the suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93377 - 2013-02-27
, and therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The following facts are taken from the record and the suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93377 - 2013-02-27
COURT OF APPEALS
were permissible in the context of the entire record; and (3) the alleged hearsay testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99684 - 2013-07-22
were permissible in the context of the entire record; and (3) the alleged hearsay testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99684 - 2013-07-22
[PDF]
State v. Terry Penny
for the record. Penny also claims that his case should have been dismissed because his trial was not commenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12967 - 2017-09-21
for the record. Penny also claims that his case should have been dismissed because his trial was not commenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12967 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. Applying that construction to the summary judgment record, we also conclude that there are no genuine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30126 - 2007-08-29
. Applying that construction to the summary judgment record, we also conclude that there are no genuine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30126 - 2007-08-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
obligations under the agency agreement. Applying that construction to the summary judgment record, we also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30126 - 2014-09-15
obligations under the agency agreement. Applying that construction to the summary judgment record, we also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30126 - 2014-09-15