Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28851 - 28860 of 63758 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 28851 - 28860 of 63758 for Motion for joint custody.
SCS of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Milwaukee County
parties brought motions for summary judgment, each arguing that the unambiguous language of the contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2607 - 2005-03-31
parties brought motions for summary judgment, each arguing that the unambiguous language of the contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2607 - 2005-03-31
State v. Tamara Norwood-Thomas
an order denying her postconviction motion. Norwood-Thomas claims: (1) the evidence was insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12932 - 2005-03-31
an order denying her postconviction motion. Norwood-Thomas claims: (1) the evidence was insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12932 - 2005-03-31
State v. David A. Sell
permits review of trial court orders denying motions to suppress evidence or determining that statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8919 - 2005-03-31
permits review of trial court orders denying motions to suppress evidence or determining that statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8919 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph Williams
), and 939.05, Stats. Williams also appeals from the order denying his postconviction motion and motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11239 - 2005-03-31
), and 939.05, Stats. Williams also appeals from the order denying his postconviction motion and motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11239 - 2005-03-31
Jacquie Hur v. Laverne Holler
. The Hollers filed a motion to dismiss on December 28, 1992, and served Hur with a set of interrogatories
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10168 - 2005-03-31
. The Hollers filed a motion to dismiss on December 28, 1992, and served Hur with a set of interrogatories
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10168 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for felony murder and from an order denying his postconviction motion. His appellate counsel has filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194955 - 2017-09-21
for felony murder and from an order denying his postconviction motion. His appellate counsel has filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194955 - 2017-09-21
State v. Gary Hampton
: [Defense Counsel], are you joining in that motion [to dismiss] on behalf of your client? [HAMPTON'S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8521 - 2005-03-31
: [Defense Counsel], are you joining in that motion [to dismiss] on behalf of your client? [HAMPTON'S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8521 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, acting pro se, appeals the order denying his postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155710 - 2017-09-21
, acting pro se, appeals the order denying his postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155710 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Barden argues that the trial court erred in three ways: first, by denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31585 - 2014-09-15
. Barden argues that the trial court erred in three ways: first, by denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31585 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) motion seeking postconviction relief.1 We conclude that Reynosa’s claims lack merit; as such, he has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=342779 - 2021-03-09
) motion seeking postconviction relief.1 We conclude that Reynosa’s claims lack merit; as such, he has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=342779 - 2021-03-09