Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28851 - 28860 of 63301 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 28851 - 28860 of 63301 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Mikkel J. Goff
postconviction motion. The main issue is whether the court erred by allowing witnesses to state their opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4169 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion. The main issue is whether the court erred by allowing witnesses to state their opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4169 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, and from an order denying his motion for resentencing.[1] Curtis asserts the sentencing court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49246 - 2010-04-26
, and from an order denying his motion for resentencing.[1] Curtis asserts the sentencing court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49246 - 2010-04-26
[PDF]
State v. Daniel L. Hanson
). He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion in which he alleged ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4806 - 2017-09-20
). He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion in which he alleged ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4806 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Daniel L Taylor
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Taylor argues that he should be granted a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11231 - 2017-09-19
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Taylor argues that he should be granted a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11231 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
from the judgment of conviction entered against him and the order denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35708 - 2009-03-03
from the judgment of conviction entered against him and the order denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35708 - 2009-03-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Anthony Ellis, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion to modify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110000 - 2017-09-21
and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Anthony Ellis, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion to modify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110000 - 2017-09-21
James Wiechmann v. Colin Ilsley
for our review—whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by granting Schreiber's motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8111 - 2005-03-31
for our review—whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by granting Schreiber's motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8111 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion for postconviction relief.[1] Robinson argues that the plea colloquy the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60393 - 2011-03-01
denying his motion for postconviction relief.[1] Robinson argues that the plea colloquy the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60393 - 2011-03-01
CA Blank Order
motion for sentence modification. Marinko was advised of his right to respond to the report and has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102924 - 2013-10-14
motion for sentence modification. Marinko was advised of his right to respond to the report and has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102924 - 2013-10-14
COURT OF APPEALS
argument for a third time in a motion after the verdict, which is deemed denied because the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29997 - 2007-08-15
argument for a third time in a motion after the verdict, which is deemed denied because the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29997 - 2007-08-15