Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28861 - 28870 of 97694 for civil court case status online.
Search results 28861 - 28870 of 97694 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
for his son-in-law under the facts of this case. The circuit court determined that the policy did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63591 - 2011-05-04
for his son-in-law under the facts of this case. The circuit court determined that the policy did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63591 - 2011-05-04
COURT OF APPEALS
for the strike.” The trial court disagreed when it ruled that “[t]he absence of a record in this case precludes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49274 - 2010-04-26
for the strike.” The trial court disagreed when it ruled that “[t]he absence of a record in this case precludes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49274 - 2010-04-26
COURT OF APPEALS
of a violation.” ¶7 After taking evidence in this case, the circuit court found Koch not guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123528 - 2014-10-09
of a violation.” ¶7 After taking evidence in this case, the circuit court found Koch not guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123528 - 2014-10-09
COURT OF APPEALS
motivated burglary in Green County circuit court case no. 1995CF53. On May 3, 1996, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33010 - 2008-06-11
motivated burglary in Green County circuit court case no. 1995CF53. On May 3, 1996, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33010 - 2008-06-11
[PDF]
STATE OF WISCONSIN, CIRCUIT COURT,
) , presiding, case no. , wherein the court (Describe judgment or order) . The name
/formdisplay/CA-110.pdf?formNumber=CA-110&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2020-08-19
) , presiding, case no. , wherein the court (Describe judgment or order) . The name
/formdisplay/CA-110.pdf?formNumber=CA-110&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2020-08-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of the occupants.’” Id., ¶4. The supreme court characterized the situation as a “close case,” but reasoned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132150 - 2014-12-22
of the occupants.’” Id., ¶4. The supreme court characterized the situation as a “close case,” but reasoned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132150 - 2014-12-22
COURT OF APPEALS
the most troubling part of the case.” The court explained: “The law in Wisconsin is clear. [A]ttorneys
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108982 - 2014-03-12
the most troubling part of the case.” The court explained: “The law in Wisconsin is clear. [A]ttorneys
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108982 - 2014-03-12
COURT OF APPEALS
the case back to the circuit court for trial. See id. ¶13 BSIS also raises two other issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140730 - 2015-04-27
the case back to the circuit court for trial. See id. ¶13 BSIS also raises two other issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140730 - 2015-04-27
COURT OF APPEALS
to proceed to trial. He further advised the court that the case had not previously been adjourned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49601 - 2010-05-03
to proceed to trial. He further advised the court that the case had not previously been adjourned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49601 - 2010-05-03
COURT OF APPEALS
appearing in this case. Thus, the record supports the trial court’s factual determination that DeFoe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102446 - 2013-09-30
appearing in this case. Thus, the record supports the trial court’s factual determination that DeFoe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102446 - 2013-09-30