Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28861 - 28870 of 38199 for ph d.

COURT OF APPEALS
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Sharod D. Weaver
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147680 - 2015-08-30

Mark Miller v. Wausau Underwriters Insurance Company
The parties agree that the City is an “owner” of “property,” within the meaning of Wis. Stat. § 895.52(1)(d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5375 - 2005-03-31

Dane County v. James P. Sullivan
thereafter.” Section 343.305(9)(d). A revocation is effective “immediately upon a final determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12913 - 2005-03-31

Rusk County Citizen Action Group, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
in s. 144.01(3). .... (d) The minimum standards adopted under this subsection shall also provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9954 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Stephen L. Jensen
affirm the judgment of conviction. BACKGROUND C.D. was born September 14, 1996, to Darlene D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14745 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
defender with him.” After a “[d]iscussion off the record,” the trial court announced: “I will talk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76219 - 2012-01-09

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 22, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of App...
John Dickson, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Chris Nagel d/b/a Nagel Service Center
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101137 - 2013-08-21

City of Baraboo v. Edwin E. Teske
Specialist, Student Study Guide,” which in Part D discusses the “Pharmacology and Physiology of Alcohol
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11603 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
Interpretation of statutes is a question of law that this court reviews independently. State v. Aaron D., 214
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29259 - 2007-06-04

Dane County Department of Human Services v. Eric A.
will assume without deciding that, if the guardian ad litem “invoke[d] the best interests of the child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18684 - 2005-06-22