Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28871 - 28880 of 56003 for so.
Search results 28871 - 28880 of 56003 for so.
State v. Ted W. Urdahl
the trial date so that he could find a new attorney. Urdahl’s new counsel filed a notice of retainer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19002 - 2005-08-30
the trial date so that he could find a new attorney. Urdahl’s new counsel filed a notice of retainer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19002 - 2005-08-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
masturbating. At one point, he smeared an ointment on her vaginal area without her consent so that he could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=593041 - 2022-11-22
masturbating. At one point, he smeared an ointment on her vaginal area without her consent so that he could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=593041 - 2022-11-22
COURT OF APPEALS
of the test, the question is whether counsel’s errors were so serious that the defendant was deprived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66551 - 2011-06-28
of the test, the question is whether counsel’s errors were so serious that the defendant was deprived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66551 - 2011-06-28
[PDF]
State v. Antonio A. Scott
). Thus, “when a plea rests in any significant degree on a promise or agreement of the prosecutor, so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14300 - 2014-09-15
). Thus, “when a plea rests in any significant degree on a promise or agreement of the prosecutor, so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14300 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
errors so serious that counsel was not functioning as the ‘counsel’ guaranteed the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32359 - 2014-09-15
errors so serious that counsel was not functioning as the ‘counsel’ guaranteed the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32359 - 2014-09-15
State v. Danny C. Eesley
on January 25, 1996, so that he could appear “in the above-titled action” on January 26, 1996. The writ also
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17282 - 2005-03-31
on January 25, 1996, so that he could appear “in the above-titled action” on January 26, 1996. The writ also
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17282 - 2005-03-31
Leslie R. Maddox v. Barricade Flasher Service, Inc.
is ‘clearly wrong’ in doing so. When there is any credible evidence to support a jury’s verdict, ‘even though
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11372 - 2005-03-31
is ‘clearly wrong’ in doing so. When there is any credible evidence to support a jury’s verdict, ‘even though
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11372 - 2005-03-31
2008 WI APP 128
that liability may be imposed on one who, having no duty to act, gratuitously undertakes to act and does so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33550 - 2008-08-26
that liability may be imposed on one who, having no duty to act, gratuitously undertakes to act and does so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33550 - 2008-08-26
2006 WI 131
the statutory limits, the sentence will not be reversed, unless it "'is so excessive and unusual and so
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27514 - 2006-12-18
the statutory limits, the sentence will not be reversed, unless it "'is so excessive and unusual and so
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27514 - 2006-12-18
State v. Larry J. Sprosty
. He looked at me. Sat it down so I’d see him sit it down. He sat it right where I could see.” After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2992 - 2005-03-31
. He looked at me. Sat it down so I’d see him sit it down. He sat it right where I could see.” After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2992 - 2005-03-31