Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28881 - 28890 of 97694 for civil court case status online.
Search results 28881 - 28890 of 97694 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
that a circuit court may not direct a verdict in a traffic forfeiture case. Turner apparently means to argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30119 - 2007-08-29
that a circuit court may not direct a verdict in a traffic forfeiture case. Turner apparently means to argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30119 - 2007-08-29
COURT OF APPEALS
to a direct appeal in two Milwaukee County circuit court cases. We conclude that Baldwin’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28987 - 2007-06-26
to a direct appeal in two Milwaukee County circuit court cases. We conclude that Baldwin’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28987 - 2007-06-26
COURT OF APPEALS
CURIAM. This case involves a challenge to the circuit court’s award of attorney’s fees. The appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58173 - 2010-12-28
CURIAM. This case involves a challenge to the circuit court’s award of attorney’s fees. The appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58173 - 2010-12-28
COURT OF APPEALS
at the close of a plaintiff’s case, a [trial] court may not grant the motion “unless it finds, as a matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40507 - 2009-09-08
at the close of a plaintiff’s case, a [trial] court may not grant the motion “unless it finds, as a matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40507 - 2009-09-08
COURT OF APPEALS
In granting CD’s motion to stay discovery at the outset of the case, the circuit court recognized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29732 - 2008-10-30
In granting CD’s motion to stay discovery at the outset of the case, the circuit court recognized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29732 - 2008-10-30
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneously entered judgment against it after it presented its cases in a trial to the court. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95359 - 2013-04-16
erroneously entered judgment against it after it presented its cases in a trial to the court. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95359 - 2013-04-16
COURT OF APPEALS
could not prove her case. After hearing the matter the trial court found that the repairs done while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37722 - 2009-07-15
could not prove her case. After hearing the matter the trial court found that the repairs done while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37722 - 2009-07-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of appeals case is overruled by the supreme court, it no longer possesses any precedential value. Blum v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64001 - 2011-05-11
of appeals case is overruled by the supreme court, it no longer possesses any precedential value. Blum v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64001 - 2011-05-11
COURT OF APPEALS
the case for failure to prosecute. At the hearing on that motion, the circuit court observed that Lazy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99971 - 2013-07-30
the case for failure to prosecute. At the hearing on that motion, the circuit court observed that Lazy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99971 - 2013-07-30
COURT OF APPEALS
the municipal court’s judgment because the case was resolved by way of a default judgment and no trial took
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31589 - 2008-01-22
the municipal court’s judgment because the case was resolved by way of a default judgment and no trial took
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31589 - 2008-01-22