Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28891 - 28900 of 63317 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 28891 - 28900 of 63317 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
from the judgment of conviction entered against him and the order denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35708 - 2009-03-03
from the judgment of conviction entered against him and the order denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35708 - 2009-03-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
as untimely the State’s motion to introduce the findings of the garbage “pulls” as other acts evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194599 - 2017-09-21
as untimely the State’s motion to introduce the findings of the garbage “pulls” as other acts evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194599 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Daniel L Taylor
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Taylor argues that he should be granted a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11231 - 2017-09-19
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Taylor argues that he should be granted a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11231 - 2017-09-19
State v. Mikkel J. Goff
postconviction motion. The main issue is whether the court erred by allowing witnesses to state their opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4169 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion. The main issue is whether the court erred by allowing witnesses to state their opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4169 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
concluded that the issue is not frivolous, but that a postconviction motion on the issue is “neither
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91782 - 2014-09-15
concluded that the issue is not frivolous, but that a postconviction motion on the issue is “neither
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91782 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
after revocation of his probation, or for appealing an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102924 - 2017-09-21
after revocation of his probation, or for appealing an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102924 - 2017-09-21
Mathew E. Levin v. Shawn M. Radtke
the court erred in denying her postjudgment motion. We affirm. ¶2 Levin’s petition alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2430 - 2005-03-31
the court erred in denying her postjudgment motion. We affirm. ¶2 Levin’s petition alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2430 - 2005-03-31
David J. Smith v. Herrling
. (setting ten-day postarraignment filing deadline for motions before trial). This claim would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11227 - 2005-03-31
. (setting ten-day postarraignment filing deadline for motions before trial). This claim would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11227 - 2005-03-31
State v. Darnell C. Stevens
pro se from an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2003-04)[1] postconviction motion seeking relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24740 - 2006-04-10
pro se from an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2003-04)[1] postconviction motion seeking relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24740 - 2006-04-10
COURT OF APPEALS
counts. ¶3 The circuit court granted Jennings’ postconviction motion for a new trial, ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84068 - 2012-06-26
counts. ¶3 The circuit court granted Jennings’ postconviction motion for a new trial, ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84068 - 2012-06-26